Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:25
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values
    G. R. Gowane
    Rani Alex
    Anupama Mukherjee
    Vikas Vohra
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [32] On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding
    Meuwissen, Theo H. E.
    Odegard, Jorgen
    Andersen-Ranberg, Ina
    Grindflek, Eli
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2014, 46
  • [33] Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Jeyun Yeon
    Thuy Tien Phan Nguyen
    Minkyung Kim
    Sung-Chur Sim
    BMC Plant Biology, 24
  • [34] Influence of Outliers on Accuracy Estimation in Genomic Prediction in Plant Breeding
    Estaghvirou, Sidi Boubacar Ould
    Ogutu, Joseph O.
    Piepho, Hans-Peter
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2014, 4 (12): : 2317 - 2328
  • [35] On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding
    Theo HE Meuwissen
    Jorgen Odegard
    Ina Andersen-Ranberg
    Eli Grindflek
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 46
  • [36] Accuracy of Estimation of Genomic Breeding Values in Pigs Using Low-Density Genotypes and Imputation
    Badke, Yvonne M.
    Bates, Ronald O.
    Ernst, Catherine W.
    Fix, Justin
    Steibel, Juan P.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2014, 4 (04): : 623 - 631
  • [37] Using eigenvalues as variance priors in the prediction of genomic breeding values by principal component analysis
    Macciotta, N. P. P.
    Gaspa, G.
    Steri, R.
    Nicolazzi, E. L.
    Dimauro, C.
    Pieramati, C.
    Cappio-Borlino, A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (06) : 2765 - 2774
  • [38] Improving accuracy of breeding values by incorporating genomic information in spatial-competition mixed models
    Cappa, Eduardo P.
    El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
    Munoz, Facundo
    Garcia, Martin N.
    Villalba, Pamela V.
    Klapste, Jaroslav
    Marcucci Poltri, Susana N.
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2017, 37 (10)
  • [39] Genetic parameters and accuracy of traditional and genomic breeding values for resistance to infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in Hereford
    Comin, H. B.
    Campos, G. S.
    Domingues, R.
    Gaspar, E. B.
    Sollero, B. P.
    Cardoso, F. F.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2022, 264
  • [40] Choice of shrinkage parameter and prediction of genomic breeding values in elite maize breeding populations
    Zhao, Yusheng
    Gowda, Manje
    Liu, Wenxin
    Wuerschum, Tobias
    Maurer, Hans P.
    Longin, Friedrich H.
    Ranc, Nicolas
    Piepho, Hans P.
    Reif, Jochen C.
    PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 132 (01) : 99 - 106