Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:25
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of prior distributions on accuracy of genomic breeding values for two dairy traits
    Nicolazzi, Ezequiel L.
    Negrini, Riccardo
    Chamberlain, Amanda J.
    Goddard, Michael E.
    Marsan, Paolo Ajmone
    Hayes, Ben J.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 12 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [22] Accuracy of genomic breeding values revisited: Assessment of two established approaches and a novel one to determine the accuracy in two-step genomic prediction
    Ni, G.
    Kipp, S.
    Simianer, H.
    Erbe, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 242 - 255
  • [23] Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance
    Vandenplas, Jeremie
    Windig, Jack J.
    Calus, Mario P. L.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49 : 1 - 19
  • [24] The impact of information quantity and strength of relationship between training set and validation set on accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values
    Saatchi, M.
    Miraei-Ashtiani, S. R.
    Javaremi, A. Nejati
    Moradi-Shahrebabak, M.
    Mehrabani-Yeghaneh, H.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 9 (04): : 438 - 442
  • [25] A new genomic prediction method with additive-dominance effects in the least-squares framework
    Liu, Hailan
    Chen, Guo-Bo
    HEREDITY, 2018, 121 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [26] A Fast EM Algorithm for BayesA-Like Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values
    Sun, Xiaochen
    Qu, Long
    Garrick, Dorian J.
    Dekkers, Jack C. M.
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [27] Accuracy of genomic values predicted using deregressed predicted breeding values as response variables
    Ramirez-Floresa, Fernanda
    Lopez-Ordaz, Rufino
    Dominguez-Viveros, Joel
    Guadalupe Garcia-Muniz, Jose
    Ruiz-Floresa, Agustin
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2017, 8 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [28] Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs
    Grossi, D. A.
    Brito, L. F.
    Jafarikia, M.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Feng, Z.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (11) : 2235 - 2245
  • [29] Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle
    Fernandes Junior, Gerardo A.
    Rosa, Guilherme J. M.
    Valente, Bruno D.
    Carvalheiro, Roberto
    Baldi, Fernando
    Garcia, Diogo A.
    Gordo, Daniel G. M.
    Espigolan, Rafael
    Takada, Luciana
    Tonussi, Rafael L.
    de Andrade, Willian B. F.
    Magalhaes, Ana F. B.
    Chardulo, Luis A. L.
    Tonhati, Humberto
    de Albuquerque, Lucia G.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2016, 48
  • [30] Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle
    Gerardo A. Fernandes Júnior
    Guilherme J. M. Rosa
    Bruno D. Valente
    Roberto Carvalheiro
    Fernando Baldi
    Diogo A. Garcia
    Daniel G. M. Gordo
    Rafael Espigolan
    Luciana Takada
    Rafael L. Tonussi
    Willian B. F. de Andrade
    Ana F. B. Magalhães
    Luis A. L. Chardulo
    Humberto Tonhati
    Lucia G. de Albuquerque
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 48