Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:27
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer)
[2]   Effects of excluding a set of random effects on prediction error variance of breeding value [J].
Cantet, RJC .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE, 1997, 114 (04) :267-274
[3]  
Culbertson MS, 1998, J ANIM SCI, V76, P448
[4]   Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers [J].
Da, Yang ;
Wang, Chunkao ;
Wang, Shengwen ;
Hu, Guo .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[5]   Whole-Genome Regression and Prediction Methods Applied to Plant and Animal Breeding [J].
de los Campos, Gustavo ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Pong-Wong, Ricardo ;
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Calus, Mario P. L. .
GENETICS, 2013, 193 (02) :327-+
[6]  
Fernando Rohan L, 2013, Methods Mol Biol, V1019, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_10
[7]  
Fisher R. A., 1970, Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution, P66, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-96
[8]  
Gilmour A.R., 2008, ASREML USER GUIDE RE
[9]   Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection [J].
Habier, David ;
Fernando, Rohan L. ;
Kizilkaya, Kadir ;
Garrick, Dorian J. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 12
[10]  
HARRIS DL, 1964, GENETICS, V50, P1319