Family language policy in multi-ethnic and multilingual villages in Yunnan, China: a comparative case study of Kena village and Anmin village

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Huiyu [1 ]
Shi, Yayu [1 ]
Li, Zihe [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Int Studies, Dept Linguist & Translat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Chinese Language & Literature, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Family language policy; ethnic minority group; China; minority language; EDUCATION; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1080/01434632.2022.2126486
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Based on Spolsky's (2004) tripartite framework for language policy, this study explores language practices, language ideology, and language management in relation to minority languages, Putonghua, and English in ethnic minority families in Yunnan, China. Through observations of and interviews with nine interethnic marriage families in Kena Village and Anmin Village, we found that although people in both villages recognise the value of their native languages in ethnic identification and cultural inheritance, people in Anmin Village make efforts to teach the children Mosuo, while children in Kena Village usually acquire Malimasa naturally. Such differences are associated with sociolinguistic environment and child agency. Meanwhile, Putonghua is widely used in television programmes and smartphone applications and acquired by the young generation due to national policy and the spread of smartphones and television. Families in both villages demonstrated similar aspirations for their children's English learning, but low socioeconomic status affected their ability to invest in foreign language learning. The results suggest that in the special context of multi-ethnic and multilingual villages in Yunnan the agency of rural parents and grandparents is relatively weak, and family language policies are mainly influenced by meso - (e.g. school) and macro- (e.g. socioeconomic environment, national policy) level factors.
引用
收藏
页码:3846 / 3861
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Kopeliovich S., 2010, DIASPORA INDIGENOUS, V4, P162, DOI [10.1080/15595692.2010.490731, DOI 10.1080/15595692.2010.490731]
[22]  
Lam A., 2002, WORLD ENGLISH, V21, P245, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-971X.00245
[23]  
Li D., 2006, ANNU REV APPL LINGUI, V26, P149, DOI [10.1017/S0267190506000080, DOI 10.1017/S0267190506000080]
[24]   Family language policy and bilingual parenting in monolingual Beijing: latent profiles and associated predictors [J].
Li, Hui ;
Wu, Dandan ;
Degotardi, Sheila ;
Chik, Alice .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND BILINGUALISM, 2022, 25 (09) :3374-3388
[25]   The complexity of family language policy decisions: The case of Cantonese and other regional Chinese varieties [J].
Li Yaling ;
Li Danli ;
Gao Xuesong .
CIRCULO DE LINGUISTICA APLICADA A LA COMUNICACION, 2019, (79) :63-78
[26]   Family language policy in English as a foreign language: a case study from China to Canada [J].
Liu, Wei ;
Lin, Xiaobing .
LANGUAGE POLICY, 2019, 18 (02) :191-207
[27]  
Miller L.T., 2016, European Veterinary conference VOORJAARSDAGEN Forensics, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs137
[28]   Community of Practice and Family Language Policy: Maintaining Heritage Japanese in Sydney-Ten Years Later [J].
Oriyama, Kaya .
INTERNATIONAL MULTILINGUAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (04) :289-307
[29]   English as a "global language" in China: An investigation into learners' and teachers' language beliefs [J].
Pan, Lin ;
Block, David .
SYSTEM, 2011, 39 (03) :391-402
[30]   A Bourdieusian perspective on child agency in family language policy [J].
Revis, Melanie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION AND BILINGUALISM, 2019, 22 (02) :177-191