Convolutional Neural Networks for Noise Classification and Denoising of Images

被引:0
作者
Sil, Dibakar [1 ]
Dutta, Arindam [1 ]
Chandra, Aniruddha [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Durgapur 713209, India
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON 2019): TECHNOLOGY, KNOWLEDGE, AND SOCIETY | 2019年
关键词
Image denoising; noise statistics; convolutional neural networks; VGG-16; Inception-v3; FFDNet;
D O I
10.1109/tencon.2019.8929277
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The goal of this paper is to find whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) performs better than the existing blind algorithms for image denoising, and, if yes, whether the noise statistics has an effect on the performance gap. For automatic identification of noise distribution, we used two different convolutional neural networks, VGG-16 and Inception-v3, and it was found that Inception-v3 identifies the noise distribution more accurately over a set of nine possible distributions, namely, Gaussian, log-normal, uniform, exponential, Poisson, salt and pepper, Rayleigh, speckle and Erlang. Next, for each of these noisy image sets, we compared the performance of FFDNet, a CNN based denoising method, with noise clinic, a blind denoising algorithm. It was found that CNN based denoising outperforms blind denoising in general, with an average improvement of 16% in peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR). The improvement is however very prominent for salt and pepper type noise with a PSNR difference of 72%, whereas for noise distributions such as Gaussian, FFDNet could achieve only a 2% improvement over noise clinic. The results indicate that for developing a CNN based optimum denoising platform, consideration of noise distribution is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 451
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation [J].
Ahumada, Albert J., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2002, 2 (01) :121-131
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P GSPX
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CoRR abs/1512.00567, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.308
[4]  
Boncelet C, 2009, ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO IMAGE PROCESSING, 2ND EDITION, P143, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374457-9.00007-X
[5]   Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression [J].
Chang, SG ;
Yu, B ;
Vetterli, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2000, 9 (09) :1532-1546
[6]   Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey [J].
Cheng, H. D. ;
Shan, Juan ;
Ju, Wen ;
Guo, Yanhui ;
Zhang, Ling .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2010, 43 (01) :299-317
[7]   Denoising module for wood texture images [J].
Hamid, Lydia Binti Abdul ;
Rosli, Nenny Ruthfalydia ;
Khairuddin, Anis Salwa Mohd ;
Mokhtar, Norrima ;
Yusof, Rubiyah .
WOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (06) :1539-1554
[8]  
Lebrun M, 2014, IEEE IMAGE PROC, P2674, DOI 10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025541
[9]   Unsupervised image classification, segmentation, and enhancement using ICA mixture models [J].
Lee, TW ;
Lewicki, MS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2002, 11 (03) :270-279
[10]   Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoiser [J].
Liao, Fangzhou ;
Liang, Ming ;
Dong, Yinpeng ;
Pang, Tianyu ;
Hu, Xiaolin ;
Zhu, Jun .
2018 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2018, :1778-1787