Q-optimized Algorithms: Theoretical Analysis of Factors Influencing Visual Quality After Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery

被引:9
作者
Jimenez, Jose R. [1 ]
Alarcon, Aixa [2 ]
Anera, Rosario G. [1 ]
Jimenez del Barco, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Opt, Lab Vis Sci & Applicat, Granada, Spain
[2] Abbott Med Opt, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
NIGHT-VISION DISTURBANCES; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; PUPIL SIZE; LASIK SURGERY; ABLATION; ASPHERICITY; BIOMECHANICS; SENSITIVITY; MODELS; EYES;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20160531-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To model the effect of pupil size, optical zone, and initial myopic level on the retinal image quality after Q-optimized myopic corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: Different Q-optimized and paraxial Munnerlyn algorithms were tested using a schematic myopic eye model to analyze the optical quality of the final retinal image for initial myopic errors from -1.00 to -7.00 diopters (D). Different optical zones (5.5, 6, and 6.5 mm in diameter) and two pupil diameters (5 and 7 mm, mesopic-scotopic conditions) were included in the comparison. Modulation transfer function (MTF) and area under the MTF from 0 to 60 cycles per degree (MTFa) were calculated by ray tracing to evaluate this retinal image quality. RESULTS: The Q-optimized algorithm with Q = -0.45 provided the highest MTF and MTFa results for myopic corrections less than -5.00 D. For refractive errors greater than -5.00 D, Q = -0.26 provided the highest MTF and MTFa results. CONCLUSIONS: Q-optimized algorithms improve the visual outcomes with respect to the paraxial Munnerlyn algorithm for myopic corneal surgery. The results show that the Q value that optimizes the results of the Q-optimized algorithm depends on the degree of myopia to correct and the size of the pupil.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 617
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Theoretical Analysis of the Effect of Pupil Size, Initial Myopic Level, and Optical Zone on Quality of Vision After Corneal Refractive Surgery
    Alarcon, Aixa
    Rubino, Manuel
    Perez-Ocon, Francisco
    Jimenez, Jose R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (12) : 901 - 905
  • [2] Differences between real and predicted corneal shapes after aspherical corneal ablation
    Anera, RG
    Villa, C
    Jiménez, JR
    Gutiérrez, R
    del Barco, LJ
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 44 (21) : 4528 - 4532
  • [3] Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis
    Anera, RG
    Jiménez, JR
    del Barco, LJ
    Bermúdez, J
    Hita, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (04) : 762 - 768
  • [4] Optical Quality and Visual Discrimination Capacity After Myopic LASIK With a Standard and Aspheric Ablation Profile
    Anera, Rosario G.
    Castro, Jose J.
    Jimenez, Jose R.
    Villa, Cesar
    Alarcon, Aixa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (08) : 597 - 601
  • [5] Laser corneal refractive surgery in the twenty-first century: a review of the impact of refractive surgery on high-order aberrations (and vice versa)
    Arba-Mosquera, Samuel
    Arbelaez, Maria C.
    de Ortueta, Diego
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2010, 57 (12) : 1041 - 1074
  • [6] Optical models for human myopic eyes
    Atchison, David A.
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (14) : 2236 - 2250
  • [7] Effect of Preoperative Pupil Size on Quality of Vision after Wavefront-Guided LASIK
    Chan, Annie
    Manche, Edward E.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 736 - 741
  • [8] A comparison of CustomCornea myopia algorithms for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis
    Chan, Colin C. K.
    Wachler, Brian S. Boxer
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 126 (08) : 1067 - 1070
  • [9] Optimum corneal asphericity of myopic eyes for refractive surgery
    Díaz, JA
    Anera, RG
    Jiménez, JR
    del Barco, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2003, 50 (12) : 1903 - 1915
  • [10] Suitability of Filofocon A and PMMA for experimental models in excimer laser ablation refractive surgery
    Dorronsoro, Carlos
    Siegel, Jan
    Remon, Laura
    Marcos, Susana
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2008, 16 (25): : 20955 - 20967