Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems

被引:24
作者
Keenan, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Peskin, Adele P. [1 ]
Wilmes, Lisa J. [2 ]
Aliu, Sheye O. [2 ]
Jones, Ella F. [2 ]
Li, Wen [2 ]
Kornak, John [3 ]
Newitt, David C. [2 ]
Hylton, Nola M. [2 ]
机构
[1] NIST, Phys Measurement Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
breast MRI; phantoms; apparent diffusion coefficient; EPI; quality control; tissue mimic; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; CANCER TRIAL; PHANTOM; LESIONS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25237
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo assess the ability of a recent, anatomically designed breast phantom incorporating T-1 and diffusion elements to serve as a quality control device for quantitative comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) within and across MRI systems. Materials and MethodsA bilateral breast phantom incorporating multiple T-1 and diffusion tissue mimics and a geometric distortion array was imaged with DWI on 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanners from two different manufacturers, using three different breast coils (three configurations total). Multiple measurements were acquired to assess the bias and variability of different diffusion weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging sequences on the scanner-coil systems. ResultsThe repeatability of ADC measurements was mixed: the standard deviation relative to baseline across scanner-coil-sequences ranged from low variability (0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-1.00) to high variability (1.69, 95% CI: 0.17-17.26), depending on material, with the lowest and highest variability from the same scanner-coil-sequence. Assessment of image distortion showed that right/left measurements of the geometric distortion array were 1 to 16% larger on the left coil side compared with the right coil side independent of scanner-coil systems, diffusion weighting, and phase-encoding direction. ConclusionThis breast phantom can be used to measure scanner-coil-sequence bias and variability for DWI. When establishing a multisystem study, this breast phantom may be used to minimize protocol differences (e.g., due to available sequences or shimming technique), to correct for bias that cannot be minimized, and to weigh results from each system depending on respective variability. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;44:846-855.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 855
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Analysis and generalized correction of the effect of spatial gradient field distortions in diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Bammer, R ;
Markl, M ;
Barnett, A ;
Acar, B ;
Alley, MT ;
Pelc, NJ ;
Glover, GH ;
Moseley, ME .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (03) :560-569
[2]   I-SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Barker, A. D. ;
Sigman, C. C. ;
Kelloff, G. J. ;
Hylton, N. M. ;
Berry, D. A. ;
Esserman, L. J. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 86 (01) :97-100
[3]   An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI [J].
Freed, Melanie ;
de Zwart, Jacco A. ;
Loud, Jennifer T. ;
El Khouli, Riham H. ;
Myers, Kyle J. ;
Greene, Mark H. ;
Duyn, Jeff H. ;
Badano, Aldo .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (02) :743-753
[4]   Multi-Site Clinical Evaluation of DW-MRI as a Treatment Response Metric for Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Galban, Craig J. ;
Ma, Bing ;
Malyarenko, Dariya ;
Pickles, Martin D. ;
Heist, Kevin ;
Henry, Norah L. ;
Schott, Anne F. ;
Neal, Colleen H. ;
Hylton, Nola M. ;
Rehemtulla, Alnawaz ;
Johnson, Timothy D. ;
Meyer, Charles R. ;
Chenevert, Thomas L. ;
Turnbull, Lindsay W. ;
Ross, Brian D. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03)
[5]   Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging [J].
Giannotti, E. ;
Waugh, S. ;
Priba, L. ;
Davis, Z. ;
Crowe, E. ;
Vinnicombe, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (09) :1729-1736
[6]  
Horkay F, 2012, US Patent, Patent No. [US2012/0068699 A1, 20120068699]
[7]   CORRECTION FOR GEOMETRIC DISTORTION IN ECHO-PLANAR IMAGES FROM B-0 FIELD VARIATIONS [J].
JEZZARD, P ;
BALABAN, RS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (01) :65-73
[8]   Twenty-five Pitfalls in the Analysis of Diffusion MRI Data [J].
Jones, Derek K. ;
Cercignani, Mara .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (07) :803-820
[9]  
Keenan KE, 2016, J MAGN RESON IMAGING
[10]   Dynamic Slice-Dependent Shim and Center Frequency Update in 3 T Breast Diffusion Weighted Imaging [J].
Lee, Seung-Kyun ;
Tan, Ek Tsoon ;
Govenkar, Ambey ;
Hancu, Ileana .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 71 (05) :1813-1818