Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin as Initial Therapy for Staphylococcus aureus Infections

被引:7
|
作者
Jobson, Synanda [1 ]
Moise, Pamela A. [2 ]
Eskandarian, Romic [1 ]
机构
[1] Glendale Adventist Med Ctr, Dept Pharmaceut Serv, Glendale, CA 91206 USA
[2] Cubist Pharmaceut, Dept Med Affairs, Lexington, MA USA
关键词
daptomycin; initial therapy; Staphylococcus aureus; vancomycin; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT; IN-VITRO; BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; COMPLICATED SKIN; BACTEREMIA; EFFICACY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; INTERMEDIATE; COMBINATION; GENTAMICIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.007
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Data comparing alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections with vancomycin MIC > 1 are lacking. Objective: We evaluated outcomes of S aureus infections based on whether daptomycin or vancomycin was used as initial therapy at a single institution, where the majority of S aureus infections had vancomycin MICs of 2 mg/L. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a 450-bed private acute care hospital. All patients > 18 years of age who received initial vancomycin or daptomycin for at least 3 days to treat an S aureus infection between November 2006 and July 2008 were included. Patients with endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or a central nervous system infection and/or those being treated for an S aureus respiratory tract infection were excluded. Results: A total of 165 patients (median age 68 years, range 24-95 years; 56% male) were included: 57 (35%) received daptomycin and 108 (65%) received vancomycin; 78% had vancomycin MIC values of 2 mg/L. The median antibiotic-related length of stay was significantly shorter with daptomycin than with vancomycin (7.5 vs 10.0 days; P = 0.035). Relapse rates in the clinically evaluable population were 25% and 23% for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively; for the subset with S aureus bacteremia with vancomycin MICs of 2 mg/L, rates were 0% (0/9 patients) and 26% (6/23 patients) for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively (P = 0.089). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 6% (10/165 patients) and did not differ significantly by treatment: 7% (4/57 patients) versus 6% (6/108 patients) for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively (P = 0.708). Conclusion: In this setting, in which the majority of S aureus infections had vancomycin MIC values of 2 mg/L, we found the median antibiotic-related length of stay to be significantly shorter with daptomycin than with vancomycin. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether daptomycin confers benefits over vancomycin in specific infection types under conditions that are unfavorable for vancomycin, such as higher vancomycin MICs. (Clin Ther. 2011;33:1391-1399) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1399
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of daptomycin for treatment Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Eisenstein, Barry I.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2007, 2 (11) : 1523 - 1536
  • [32] Addition of Ceftaroline to Daptomycin after Emergence of Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus during Therapy Improves Antibacterial Activity
    Rose, Warren E.
    Schulz, Lucas T.
    Andes, David
    Striker, Rob
    Berti, Andrew D.
    Hutson, Paul R.
    Shukla, Sanjay K.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (10) : 5296 - 5302
  • [33] Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections; Is There Difference in Mortality Between Patients?
    Aminzadeh, Zohreh
    Yadegarynia, Davood
    Fatemi, Alireza
    Dehkordi, Elham Tahmasebian
    Armaki, Saeed Azad
    JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 7 (10)
  • [34] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with daptomycin or vancomycin
    Rubio-Terres, Carlos
    Rubio-Rodriguez, Dario
    Majos, Nuria
    Grau, Santiago
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2012, 25 (04) : 283 - 292
  • [35] Therapeutic outcome of spinal implant infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus A retrospective observational study
    Cho, Oh-Hyun
    Bae, In-Gyu
    Moon, Song Mi
    Park, Seong Yeon
    Kwak, Yee Gyung
    Kim, Baek-Nam
    Yu, Shi Nae
    Jeon, Min Hyok
    Kim, Tark
    Choo, Eun Ju
    Lee, Eun Jung
    Kim, Tae Hyong
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Chung, Jin-Won
    Kang, Kyung-Chung
    Lee, Jung Hee
    Lee, Yu-Mi
    Lee, Mi Suk
    Park, Ki-Ho
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [36] Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus: The Role of Combination Therapy with Daptomycin and Gentamicin
    Jiang, Jhih-Hang
    Peleg, Anton Y.
    GENES, 2015, 6 (04) : 1256 - 1267
  • [37] Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations: study protocol for a phase IIB randomized controlled trial
    Kalimuddin, Shirin
    Phillips, Rachel
    Gandhi, Mihir
    de Souza, Nurun Nisa
    Low, Jenny G. H.
    Archuleta, Sophia
    Lye, David
    Tan, Thuan Tong
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [38] Daptomycin versus vancomycin for osteoarticular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a nested case-control study
    Liang, S. Y.
    Khair, H. N.
    McDonald, J. R.
    Babcock, H. M.
    Marschall, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 33 (04) : 659 - 664
  • [39] Vancomycin and daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations as a predictor of outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Ruiz, Jesus
    Ramirez, Paula
    Concha, Pablo
    Salavert-Lleti, Miguel
    Villarreal, Esther
    Gordon, Monica
    Frasquet, Juan
    Castellanos-Ortega, Alvaro
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2018, 14 : 141 - 144
  • [40] Evaluation of Telavancin Activity versus Daptomycin and Vancomycin against Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model
    Steed, Molly E.
    Vidaillac, Celine
    Rybak, Michael J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (02) : 955 - 959