Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin as Initial Therapy for Staphylococcus aureus Infections

被引:7
|
作者
Jobson, Synanda [1 ]
Moise, Pamela A. [2 ]
Eskandarian, Romic [1 ]
机构
[1] Glendale Adventist Med Ctr, Dept Pharmaceut Serv, Glendale, CA 91206 USA
[2] Cubist Pharmaceut, Dept Med Affairs, Lexington, MA USA
关键词
daptomycin; initial therapy; Staphylococcus aureus; vancomycin; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT; IN-VITRO; BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; COMPLICATED SKIN; BACTEREMIA; EFFICACY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; INTERMEDIATE; COMBINATION; GENTAMICIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.007
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Data comparing alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections with vancomycin MIC > 1 are lacking. Objective: We evaluated outcomes of S aureus infections based on whether daptomycin or vancomycin was used as initial therapy at a single institution, where the majority of S aureus infections had vancomycin MICs of 2 mg/L. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a 450-bed private acute care hospital. All patients > 18 years of age who received initial vancomycin or daptomycin for at least 3 days to treat an S aureus infection between November 2006 and July 2008 were included. Patients with endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or a central nervous system infection and/or those being treated for an S aureus respiratory tract infection were excluded. Results: A total of 165 patients (median age 68 years, range 24-95 years; 56% male) were included: 57 (35%) received daptomycin and 108 (65%) received vancomycin; 78% had vancomycin MIC values of 2 mg/L. The median antibiotic-related length of stay was significantly shorter with daptomycin than with vancomycin (7.5 vs 10.0 days; P = 0.035). Relapse rates in the clinically evaluable population were 25% and 23% for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively; for the subset with S aureus bacteremia with vancomycin MICs of 2 mg/L, rates were 0% (0/9 patients) and 26% (6/23 patients) for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively (P = 0.089). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 6% (10/165 patients) and did not differ significantly by treatment: 7% (4/57 patients) versus 6% (6/108 patients) for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively (P = 0.708). Conclusion: In this setting, in which the majority of S aureus infections had vancomycin MIC values of 2 mg/L, we found the median antibiotic-related length of stay to be significantly shorter with daptomycin than with vancomycin. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether daptomycin confers benefits over vancomycin in specific infection types under conditions that are unfavorable for vancomycin, such as higher vancomycin MICs. (Clin Ther. 2011;33:1391-1399) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1399
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Photodynamic therapy for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Perez, Camila
    Zuniga, Tania
    Palavecino, Christian Erick
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2021, 34
  • [22] Duration of prior vancomycin therapy and subsequent daptomycin treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Culshaw, Darren
    Lamp, Kenneth C.
    Yoon, Min J.
    Lodise, Thomas P.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2015, 83 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [23] Daptomycin versus placebo as an adjunct to beta-lactam therapy in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Cheng, Matthew P.
    Lawandi, Alexander
    Butler-Laporte, Guillaume
    Paquette, Katryn
    Lee, Todd C.
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [24] Comparative Effectiveness of Switching to Daptomycin Versus Remaining on Vancomycin Among Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bloodstream Infections
    Schweizer, Marin L.
    Richardson, Kelly
    Sarrazin, Mary S. Vaughan
    Goto, Michihiko
    Livorsi, Daniel J.
    Nair, Rajeshwari
    Alexander, Bruce
    Beck, Brice F.
    Jones, Michael P.
    Puig-Asensio, Mireia
    Suh, Daniel
    Ohl, Madeline
    Perencevich, Eli N.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 : S68 - S73
  • [25] Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin or Daptomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Chunjiang
    Ye, Chao
    Liao, Linglong
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Hu, Ying
    Deng, Chao
    Liu, Liang
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (11)
  • [26] A Retrospective Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Vancomycin versus Daptomycin in Hemodialysis Patients
    Kato, Hideo
    Hagihara, Mao
    Kato, Mariko
    Yamagishi, Yuka
    Umemura, Takumi
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Hirai, Jun
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (06):
  • [27] Daptomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections complicated by septic pulmonary emboli
    Crass, Ryan L.
    Powell, Kelsey L.
    Huang, Angela M.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 93 (02) : 131 - 135
  • [28] Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection with or without Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Maraolo, Alberto Enrico
    Giaccone, Agnese
    Gentile, Ivan
    Saracino, Annalisa
    Bavaro, Davide Fiore
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (08):
  • [29] Emerging issues on Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and the role in therapy of daptomycin plus fosfomycin
    Garcia de la Maria, Cristina
    Canas, Maria-Alexandra
    Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana
    Dahl, Anders
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Javier
    Hernandez-Meneses, Marta
    Cuervo, Guillermo
    Moreno, Asuncion
    Miro, Jose M.
    Marco, Francesc
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2023, 21 (03) : 281 - 293
  • [30] Use of Daptomycin to Treat Infections With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Having Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of 1.5 to 2 μg/mL
    McDaneld, Patrick M.
    Spooner, Linda M.
    Mohr, John F.
    Belliveau, Paul P.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (12) : 1654 - 1665