Q-METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY PERCEPTIONS OF DECEASED ORGAN DONATION IN THE UK

被引:0
|
作者
Muaid, R. M. [1 ]
Chesney, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
来源
VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV | 2022年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Organ donation; Q methodology; behavioural interventions;
D O I
10.15825/1995-1191-2022-1-117-125
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Attitude towards organ donation is predominantly positive in the UK, however, donation rate remains low. To develop more effective interventions, this research aims to examine the behavioural barriers in organ donations using Q methodology to elicit patterns of overlap among different barriers and motivators. Method. A Q methodology study was conducted with 40 participants aged 19-64 were asked to rank 47 statements on issues that are associated with organ donation. By-person factor analysis using Centroid method and Varimax rotation was conducted to bring out patterns in the way statements were ranked to obtain groupings of participants who had arranged the statements in similar fashion. Results. Four viewpoints were extracted: The Realist, the Optimist Hesitant, the Pessimist Determinant and the Empathetic. Salient barriers to organ donation presented in each viewpoint suggest that perceived lack of knowledge, anxiety, mistrust in the healthcare system and lack of cue to action are the main barriers to organ donation. Consensus statements suggest that religion and family agreement are inconsequential if attitude to organ donation is well formed. Conclusion. There are different attitudes around deceased organ donation that were uncovered using Q methodology. These results suggest that people respond to behavioural change campaigns differently depending in their own perceptions on organ donation. We argue that a paradigm shift in behavioural interventions is underpinned by understanding the overlapping yet distinctive nature perceived perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 125
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling Lay People's Ethical Attitudes to Organ Donation: A Q-Methodology Study
    Hammami, Muhammad M.
    Hammami, Muhammad
    Aboushaar, Reem
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2020, 14 : 173 - 189
  • [2] Legal framework governing deceased organ donation in the UK
    Price, D. P. T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 : I68 - I72
  • [3] Q-Methodology A Technique to Assess Perceptions in Simulation Research
    Klein, Barbie A.
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2022, 17 (01): : E128 - E135
  • [4] Parents' perceptions and attitudes on childhood obesity: A Q-methodology study
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Dehghan, Mahshid
    Morrison, Katherine M.
    Fonseka, Sujeewa
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2011, 23 (02): : 67 - 75
  • [5] Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in a South African University: A Q-Methodology Approach
    Finchilescu, Gillian
    Cooper, Adam
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 28 (04) : 284 - 301
  • [6] Science teacher's perceptions of the nature of technology: a Q-methodology study
    Turkoglu, Ayse Yenilmez
    Aydin, Fatih
    Es, Huseyin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (05) : 2671 - 2696
  • [7] Science teacher’s perceptions of the nature of technology: a Q-methodology study
    Ayse Yenilmez Turkoglu
    Fatih Aydin
    Huseyin Es
    International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2022, 32 : 2671 - 2696
  • [8] Perceptions of resilience in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A Q-methodology study
    Chon, Mi Young
    Yeun, Eun Ja
    Jung, Kyoung Hee
    Jo, Young-il
    Lee, Kyeong Ryong
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 22 (01) : 108 - 117
  • [9] Q-methodology to identify young adult renal transplant recipients at risk for nonadherence
    Tielen, Miriam
    van Staa, Anne Loes
    Jedeloo, Susan
    van Exel, N. Job A.
    Weimar, Willem
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 85 (05) : 700 - 706
  • [10] Q-methodology and tourism research
    Stergiou, Dimitrios
    Airey, David
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2011, 14 (04) : 311 - 322