Exploring the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being by understanding the preferences for natural capital-based and produced capital-based ecosystem services

被引:12
作者
Hori, Keiko [1 ]
Kamiyama, Chiho [1 ]
Saito, Osamu [1 ]
机构
[1] United Nat Univ, Inst Adv Study Sustainabil, 5-53-70 Jingumae, Tokyo 1508925, Japan
关键词
Ecosystem services; Natural capital; Produced capital; Preference; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-018-0632-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scenario analysis is recognized as a useful tool for exploring future changes in the relationships between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being. This analysis should be carried out not only by experts but also by relevant stakeholders such as the public. In this study, we investigated the preference of Japanese people toward natural and produced capital-based ES by distributing questionnaires to the public for exploring the direction of ES utilization in the future. Respondents with diverse backgrounds living in Tokyo and Nanao city in Ishikawa prefecture answered a series of questions about the extent to which they preferred natural or produced capital-based ES. As the general tendency of the results, the preferences for ES from the natural capitals were stronger than ES from produced capital. The trends varied, depending on the attributes of the respondents. The stronger preference for natural capital-based ES was possibly a positive indication that utilizing ES from the natural capitals was significantly beneficial for human well-being. The results were informative to understand public perception on key aspects of ES utilization scenarios, including their preferences for specific types of ES.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Daw, Tim M.
    Bohensky, Erin L.
    Butler, James R. A.
    Hill, Rosemary
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    Quinlan, Allyson
    Ravera, Federica
    Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel
    Thyresson, Matilda
    Mistry, Jayalaxshmi
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Waylen, Kerry A.
    Beach, Dylan M.
    Bohnet, Iris C.
    Hamann, Maike
    Hanspach, Jan
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Vilardy, Sandra P.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (04):
  • [32] PANCES, 2017, OFF HOM
  • [33] Saito O, 2015, S SOC ENV SCI JAP, P12
  • [34] Saito O, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI
  • [35] Towards a general sustainability assessment of human/industrial and nature-based solutions
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (04) : 1185 - 1191
  • [36] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2002, BROCH TRAD KNOWL CON
  • [37] Biophilia as a Universal Ethic for Conserving Biodiversity
    Simaika, John P.
    Samways, Michael J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 903 - 906
  • [38] Urban agriculture of the future: an overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings
    Specht, Kathrin
    Siebert, Rosemarie
    Hartmann, Ina
    Freisinger, Ulf B.
    Sawicka, Magdalena
    Werner, Armin
    Thomaier, Susanne
    Henckel, Dietrich
    Walk, Heike
    Dierich, Axel
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 31 (01) : 33 - 51
  • [39] Tanaka T, 2014, J ENV ENG AIJ, V79, P286
  • [40] Uk NEA, 2011, UK NAT EC ASS SYNTH