Multi-criteria and focus group analysis for social acceptance of wind energy

被引:44
作者
Caporale, Diana [1 ]
Sangiorgio, Valentino [1 ]
Amodio, Alessandro [2 ]
De Lucia, Caterina [3 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Bari, Dept Civil Environm Land Construct & Chem, Via Edoardo Orabona 4, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[2] Polytech Univ Milano, Dept Elect Comp Sci & Bioengn, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ, Piazza Largo Papa Giovanni Paolo II,1, I-71100 Foggia, Italy
关键词
Social acceptance to wind energy; Focus group; Optimized analytical hierarchy process; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ONSHORE WIND; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; DECISION-MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT; BAT FATALITIES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111387
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the last decades, the debate on renewable energy has received international attention. In the European countries, several wind energy projects encounter objections and protests from the neighbouring population of wind farm sites. This study aims to understand the drivers of this obstructive behaviour suggesting the main issues to discuss for adequate regulatory strategies to promote at community level. The novelty of this study is that for the first time, qualitative - Focus Group - and quantitative - Optimized-Analytic Hierarchy Process and Monte Carlo simulation - approaches, are used synergistically to support the view of a social acceptance to wind energy. In particular, the analysis focuses on: i) People's perception of wind energy in a context of public engagement; ii) Assessment of the factors affecting a wind farm; iii) Differences occurring in people's perception living nearby or far from wind farms. Main results suggest a general critical attitude due to misinformation and lack of transparency of governmental institutions. Moreover, the density of turbines, dismantling process and impacts on landscape and ecosystems need particular attention. Finally, our results show that the distance to wind farms would not sensibly affect the social acceptance across groups of stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 144 条
[31]   Consequences of a cumulative perspective on marine environmental impacts: Offshore wind farming and seabirds at North Sea scale in context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive [J].
Busch, Malte ;
Kannen, Andreas ;
Garthe, Stefan ;
Jessopp, Mark .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 71 :213-224
[32]   Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models [J].
Butler, J ;
Jia, JM ;
Dyer, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (03) :531-546
[33]   Social acceptance of on-shore wind energy in Apulia Region (Southern Italy) [J].
Caporale, Diana ;
De Lucia, Caterina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :1378-1390
[34]   The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research [J].
Carter, Nancy ;
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise ;
DiCenso, Alba ;
Blythe, Jennifer ;
Neville, Alan J. .
ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2014, 41 (05) :545-547
[36]   A sensitivity analysis algorithm for hierarchical decision models [J].
Chen, Hongyi ;
Kocaoglu, Dundar F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 185 (01) :266-288
[37]   Topic representation: Finding more representative words in topic models [J].
Chi, Jinjin ;
Ouyang, Jihong ;
Li, Changchun ;
Dong, Xueyang ;
Li, Ximing ;
Wang, Xinhua .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2019, 123 :53-60
[38]   The diffusion of microgeneration technologies - assessing the influence of perceived product characteristics on home owners' willingness to pay [J].
Claudy, Marius C. ;
Michelsen, Claus ;
O'Driscoll, Aidan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) :1459-1469
[39]   Consumer awareness in the adoption of microgeneration technologies An empirical investigation in the Republic of Ireland [J].
Claudy, Marius C. ;
Michelsen, Claus ;
O'Driscoll, Aidan ;
Mullen, Michael R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (07) :2154-2160
[40]   Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review [J].
Cohen, Jed J. ;
Reichl, Johannes ;
Schmidthaler, Michael .
ENERGY, 2014, 76 :4-9