Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review

被引:18
|
作者
Ryom, Knud [1 ]
Hargaard, Anne-Sofie [1 ]
Melby, Paulina Sander [2 ]
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen [1 ,2 ]
Bentsen, Peter [3 ]
Ntoumanis, Nikos [4 ,5 ]
Schoeppe, Stephanie [6 ]
Nielsen, Glen [7 ,8 ]
Elsborg, Peter [2 ,3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Hlth Promot Res, Gentofte, Denmark
[3] Bispebjerg Res Unit, Ctr Clin Res & Prevent, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Danish Ctr Motivat & Behav Sci, Dept Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
[5] Halmstad Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Halmstad, Sweden
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Nutr Exercise & Sports, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Nutr Exercise & Sports, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
PUBLIC HEALTH; SPORTS MEDICINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; MULTIDIMENSIONAL OUTCOME EXPECTATIONS; BEHAVIORAL-REGULATION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; EFFICACY; SPORT; SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058351
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Physical literacy (PL) is a comprehensive concept covering motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of individuals' physical activity throughout life. PL has three overlapping domains, such as: an affective, a physical and a cognitive domain. So far, PL has not been measured in the adults and no complete measurement has been developed to date. Objectives The aim of this scoping review was to review existing self-reported instruments measuring different elements of domains of PL. Method We reviewed Education Research Complete, Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. The reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Studies were coded using a thematic framework, which was based on the three domains of PL. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age groups between 18 and 60 years; (2) meta-analyses, reviews or quantitative studies focusing on the measurement of at least one of the three domains of PL and (3) instrument that was self-reported. We finalised search on 1 August 2021 Results In total, 67 articles were identified as studies describing instruments reflecting the three domains of PL. Following full-text reading, 21 articles that met our inclusion criteria were included. Several instruments of relevance to PL are available for assessing motivation, confidence and the physical domain. However, few instruments exist that measure elements of the cognitive domain. Conclusion This review showed that a range of existing and validated instruments exists, covering two out of the three domains of PL, namely affective and physical domains. However, for the knowledge domain no valid measurement tools could be found. This scoping review has identified gaps in the research (namely the cognitive domain) and also a gap in the research as no measures that consider the inter-relatedness of the three domains (holistic nature of the concept).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generic Health Literacy Measurements for Adults: A Scoping Review
    Tian, Cindy Yue
    Xu, Richard Huan
    Mo, Phoenix Kit-Han
    Dong, Dong
    Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 18
  • [2] Self-reported health literacy and medication adherence in older adults: a systematic review
    Schoenfeld, Moritz Sebastian
    Pfisterer-Heise, Stefanie
    Bergelt, Corinna
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [3] Physical literacy assessment in adults: A systematic review
    Boldovskaia, Aia
    Dias, Nuno Manuel Goncalves
    Silva, Marlene N.
    Carraca, Eliana V.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [4] Generic Self-Reported Questionnaires Measuring Self-Management: A Scoping Review
    Hudon, Emilie
    Hudon, Catherine
    Lambert, Mireille
    Bisson, Mathieu
    Chouinard, Maud-Christine
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (06) : 855 - 865
  • [5] A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools
    Jiang, Hu
    Wang, Wenna
    Mei, Yongxia
    Zhao, Zhixin
    Lin, Beilei
    Zhang, Zhenxiang
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools
    Hu Jiang
    Wenna Wang
    Yongxia Mei
    Zhixin Zhao
    Beilei Lin
    Zhenxiang Zhang
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [7] Self-reported physical activity compared with maximal oxygen uptake in adults
    Aadahl, Mette
    Kjaer, Michael
    Kristensen, Jens H.
    Mollerup, Birgit
    Jorgensen, Torben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2007, 14 (03): : 422 - 428
  • [8] Review of Self-reported Physical Activity Assessments for Pregnancy: Summary of the Evidence for Validity and Reliability
    Evenson, Kelly R.
    Chasan-Taber, Lisa
    Downs, Danielle Symons
    Pearce, Emily E.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (05) : 479 - 494
  • [9] Correlates of pedometer-measured and self-reported physical activity among young Australian adults
    Cleland, Verity J.
    Schmidt, Michael D.
    Salmon, Jo
    Dwyer, Terence
    Venn, Alison
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2011, 14 (06) : 496 - 503
  • [10] Relationships of self-reported physical activity domains with accelerometry recordings in French adults
    Jacobi, David
    Charles, Marie-Aline
    Tafflet, Muriel
    Lommez, Agnes
    Borys, Jean-Michel
    Oppert, Jean-Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (04) : 171 - 179