Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B-juncea) to soil water deficits: Plant water relations and growth

被引:41
作者
Wright, PR
Morgan, JM
Jessop, RS
机构
[1] UNIV NEW ENGLAND,ARMIDALE,NSW 2351,AUSTRALIA
[2] TAMWORTH CROP IMPROVEMENT CTR,TAMWORTH,NSW 2340,AUSTRALIA
关键词
plant water relations; canola; drought; turgor; Indian mustard;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01033-7
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The work reported in this paper was designed to describe how mustard achieves,greater dry matter production and yield compared to canola under water-deficit conditions. The work was based on three field experiments which each used at least three cultivars or lines of each species. Mustard leaves had greater turgor pressure than those of canola (up to 0.36 MPa greater). Mustard's growth advantage increased with increasing stress with total leaf area duration being longer (1.5 times) and crop growth rates greater (up to 2 times) than those of canola under high water deficits. These differences in growth were positively correlated with leaf turgor. Mustard also grew better under low water deficits particularly early in the season; these differences were associated with differences in early season leaf morphology (lower specific leaf weights) rather than with differences in the partitioning of assimilate to leaf growth. However, the early growth differences were also linked with differences in turgor, suggesting that mustard's turgor advantage at least partially explained its superior early vigour. It is concluded that the greater leaf turgor of mustard is a key factor in this crop's adaptive advantage under high water deficits, allowing it to maintain longer leaf area duration and thereby greater dry weight and seed yield compared to canola.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 64
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
CHAUDHARY BD, 1989, BIOL PLANTARUM, V31, P202
[2]  
DAVIES WJ, 1991, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V42, P55, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.000415
[3]   ROOT AND SHOOT GROWTH, AND WATER AND LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY OF BARLEY AND WHEAT CROPS GROWN ON A SHALLOW DUPLEX SOIL IN A MEDITERRANEAN-TYPE ENVIRONMENT [J].
GREGORY, PJ ;
TENNANT, D ;
BELFORD, RK .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1992, 43 (03) :555-573
[4]   REVISED GROWTH-STAGE KEY FOR BRASSICA-CAMPESTRIS AND B-NAPUS [J].
HARPER, FR ;
BERKENKAMP, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1975, 55 (02) :657-657
[5]   GENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES IN LEAF WATER RELATIONS BETWEEN BRASSICA-JUNCEA AND BRASSICA-NAPUS [J].
KUMAR, A ;
ELSTON, J .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1992, 70 (01) :3-9
[6]  
Lewan L., 1988, Agri Hortique Genetica, V46, P49
[7]  
Lewis G. J, 1992, THESIS U W AUSTR PER
[8]   VARIATION IN TEMPERATE CEREALS IN RAIN-FED ENVIRONMENTS .1. GRAIN-YIELD, BIOMASS AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS [J].
LOPEZCASTANEDA, C ;
RICHARDS, RA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1994, 37 (01) :51-62
[9]  
LOPEZCASTANEDA C, 1995, CROP SCI, V35, P472, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020032x
[10]   COMPLETE TURGOR MAINTENANCE AT LOW WATER POTENTIALS IN THE ELONGATING REGION OF MAIZE LEAVES [J].
MICHELENA, VA ;
BOYER, JS .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 69 (05) :1145-1149