Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot

被引:25
作者
Sormaala, Markus J. [1 ,3 ]
Ruohola, Juha-Petri [1 ]
Mattila, Ville M. [1 ,2 ]
Koskinen, Seppo K. [3 ]
Pihlajamaki, Harri K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Mil Med, Res Dept, FIN-00301 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Trauma, Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
RESOLUTION MRI; FRACTURES; INJURIES; ANKLE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-12-128
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Bone stress injuries are common in athletes and military recruits. Only a minority of bone stress changes are available on plain radiographs. Acute bone stress is often visible on MRI as bone marrow edema, which is also seen in many other disease processes such as malignancies, inflammatory conditions and infections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of radiographs, 1.5T and 3T MRI to identify acute bone marrow changes in the foot. Methods: Ten patients with 12 stress fractures seen on plain radiographs underwent MRI using 1.5T and 3T scanners. T1 FSE and STIR axial, sagittal, and coronal view sequences were obtained. Two musculoskeletal radiologists interpreted the images independently and by consensus in case of disagreement. Results: Of the 63 acute bone stress changes seen on 3T images, 61 were also seen on 1.5T images. The sensitivity of 1.5T MRI was 97% (95% CI: 89%-99%) compared with 3T. The 3T MRI images where, therefore, at least equally sensitive to 1.5T scanners in detection of bone marrow edema. On T1-weighted sequences, 3T images were slightly superior to 1.5T images in visualizing the demarcation of the edema and bone trabeculae. The kappa-value for inter-observer variability was 0.86 in the MRI indicating substantial interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Owing to slightly better resolution of 3T images, edema characterization is easier, which might aid in the differential diagnosis of the bone marrow edema. There was, however, no noteworthy difference in the sensitivity of the 1.5T and 3T images to bone marrow edema. Routine identification of acute bone stress changes and suspected stress injuries can, therefore, be made with 1.5T field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   TI-weighted MRI characteristics of pedal osteomyelitis [J].
Collins, MS ;
Schaar, MM ;
Wenger, DE ;
Mandrekar, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (02) :386-393
[2]   Three-tesla imaging of the knee: initial experience [J].
Craig, JG ;
Go, L ;
Blechinger, J ;
Hearshen, D ;
Bouffard, JA ;
Diamond, M ;
van Holsbeeck, MT .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (08) :453-461
[3]   Bone stress injury of the ankle in professional ballet dancers seen on MRI [J].
Elias, Ilan ;
Zoga, Adam C. ;
Raikin, Steven M. ;
Peterson, Judith R. ;
Besser, Marcus P. ;
Morrison, William B. ;
Schweitzer, Mark E. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[4]   TIBIAL STRESS REACTION IN RUNNERS - CORRELATION OF CLINICAL SYMPTOMS AND SCINTIGRAPHY WITH A NEW MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING GRADING SYSTEM [J].
FREDERICSON, M ;
BERGMAN, AG ;
HOFFMAN, KL ;
DILLINGHAM, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (04) :472-481
[5]   Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Relaxation times and image contrast [J].
Gold, GE ;
Han, E ;
Stainsby, J ;
Wright, G ;
Brittain, J ;
Beaulieu, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) :343-351
[6]  
KOSKINEN SK, 1992, ANN MED MILIT FENN, V67, P83
[7]  
Magee Thomas, 2007, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V15, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.mric.2007.02.005
[8]   3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears [J].
Magee, Thomas ;
Williams, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (02) :371-375
[9]  
Mosher Timothy J, 2006, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V14, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.002
[10]   Bone stress injuries of the ankle and foot - An 86-month magnetic resonance imaging-based study of physically active young adults [J].
Niva, Maria H. ;
Sormaala, Markus J. ;
Kiuru, Martti J. ;
Haataja, Riina ;
Ahovuo, Juhani A. ;
Pihlajamaki, Harri K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04) :643-649