Oral contraceptive pretreatment does not improve outcome in microdose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol among poor responder intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients

被引:13
|
作者
Duvan, Candan Iltemir [1 ]
Berker, Bulent [2 ]
Turhan, Nilgun Ozturk [1 ]
Satiroglu, Hakan [2 ]
机构
[1] Fatih Univ Med Sch, IVF Unit, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, IVF Unit, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
intra cytoplasmic sperm injection; microdose GnRH-a; oral contraceptive; poor responder;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-008-9203-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare oral contraceptive (OC) pretreatment plus microdose GnRH-a in flare-up protocol and non-OC microdose GnRH-a in flare-up protocol among poor responder ICSI patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of poor responder ICSI patients. Patients were divided into two groups according to used microdose protocol. Precycle treatment with OC followed by follicular phase administration of 40 mu g sc leuprolide acetate (LA) every 12 h beginning on after 2 day pill-free period and rFSH administration was begun on the third day of LA administration (OC-Group, n = 26). Alternatively on day 2 after menses, patients were administered similar stimulation regime (non-OC Group, n = 27). Results There were no significant differences between groups in the number of oocytes, peak estradiol levels, endometrial thickness, fertilization rates and embryo quality. Implantations and pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were similar. Conclusion ment plus microdose GnRHa in flare-up protocol does not offer advantages over non-OC microdose GnRHa in flare-up protocol among poor responder ICSI patients.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 93
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Oral contraceptive pretreatment does not improve outcome in microdose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol among poor responder intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients
    Candan Iltemir Duvan
    Bulent Berker
    Nilgun Ozturk Turhan
    Hakan Satiroglu
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2008, 25 : 89 - 93
  • [2] Prospective randomized study of an ultrashort gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus a modified suppression protocol for ovarian stimulation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
    Strohmer, H
    Chatwani, S
    Wieser, F
    Danninger, B
    Obruca, A
    Feichtinger, W
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) : 1403 - 1408
  • [3] Comparison of GnRH-Agonist Microdose Flare-up Protocol and Flexible Multiple Dose Antagonistic Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle
    Uludag, Semih
    Kutuk, Mehmet Serdar
    Dolanbay, Mehmet
    Altun, Ozguc
    Ozgun, Mahmut Tuncay
    Aygen, Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 35 (02) : 52 - 55
  • [4] Effect of Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Addition for Luteal Support on Pregnancy Outcome in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ma, Xiaoling
    Du, Wenjing
    Hu, Junping
    Yang, Yuan
    Zhang, Xuehong
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2020, 85 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [5] Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle
    Kahraman, Korhan
    Berker, Bulent
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Cetinkaya, Esra
    Aytac, Rusen
    Satiroglu, Hakan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (06) : 2437 - 2444
  • [6] Stimulation of the young poor responder: comparison of the luteal estradiol/gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol versus oral contraceptive microdose leuprolide
    Shastri, Shefali M.
    Barbieri, Elizabeth
    Kligman, Isaac
    Schoyer, Katherine D.
    Davis, Owen K.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (02) : 592 - 595
  • [7] A randomized prospective study of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist microdose flare-up protocol in poor responder patients
    Ozdogan, S.
    Ozdegirmenci, O.
    Dilbaz, S.
    Demir, B.
    Cinar, O.
    Dilbaz, B.
    Goktolga, U.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [8] Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    Jahangiri, Nadia
    Madani, Tahereh
    Khodabakhshi, Shabnam
    Chehrazi, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [9] Cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy combined with high-dose urinary gonadotrophins does not improve the outcome of IVF-ET cycle in poor responders
    Karacan, M.
    Demircan, A.
    Karabulut, O.
    Kervancioglu, E.
    Benhabib, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 142 - 143
  • [10] Protocol shift from agonist to antagonist or vice versa after an unsuccessful intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle on the same patient does not improve outcome
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Ulusoy, Can Ozan
    Ozmen, Batuhan
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Berker, Bulent
    Aytac, Rusen
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (03): : 417 - 420