Agricultural biotechnology and regulatory innovation in India

被引:4
作者
Freeman, Julia [1 ]
Satterfield, Terre
Kandlikar, Milind [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Liu Inst Global Issues, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; BIOSAFETY; MEXICO; POLICY; CROPS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3152/030234211X12924093660318
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article uses comparative analyses of both US and EU regulations to understand the evolution of Indian policies aimed at regulating genetically engineered agriculture (primarily cotton). India initially borrowed extensively from OECD regulations, predictably emphasizing human health and environmental impacts. Over time, however, India's biosafety regulations have evolved to reflect the twin imperatives of development and democracy. India expanded biosafety initially to address the economic security of farmers and later, and to a lesser extent, to increase citizen participation and consultation. Much of this reconstitution has been realized through public interest litigation critical of agri-biotech regulation brought about by urban civil society groups, a legal tool that may no longer be applied under India's proposed National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 331
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]  
Damodaran A., 2005, LAW ENV DEV J, P1
[12]  
Dembowski H., 2001, Taking the State to Court: Public Interest Litigation and the Public Sphere in Metropolitan India
[13]  
Department of Biotechnology (DBT), 2008, EST PLAN NA IN PRESS
[14]  
FISCHER A, 2007, HEILDELBERG PAPERS S, V34, P1
[15]   Importing corn, exporting labor: The neoliberal corn regime, GMOs, and the erosion of Mexican biodiversity [J].
Fitting, E .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2006, 23 (01) :15-26
[16]   The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk [J].
Frewer, LJ ;
Miles, S ;
Marsh, R .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (04) :701-711
[17]  
Fukuda-Parr Sakiko., 2007, The Gene Revolution GM Crops and Unequal Development
[18]  
GUPTA A, 2000, 200024 HARV U KENN S
[19]   The influence of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China and South Africa [J].
Gupta, Aarti ;
Falkner, Robert .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2006, 6 (04) :23-+
[20]   Biotechnology in agriculture [J].
Herdt, Robert W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 :265-295