Agricultural biotechnology and regulatory innovation in India

被引:4
作者
Freeman, Julia [1 ]
Satterfield, Terre
Kandlikar, Milind [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Liu Inst Global Issues, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
关键词
DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; BIOSAFETY; MEXICO; POLICY; CROPS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3152/030234211X12924093660318
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article uses comparative analyses of both US and EU regulations to understand the evolution of Indian policies aimed at regulating genetically engineered agriculture (primarily cotton). India initially borrowed extensively from OECD regulations, predictably emphasizing human health and environmental impacts. Over time, however, India's biosafety regulations have evolved to reflect the twin imperatives of development and democracy. India expanded biosafety initially to address the economic security of farmers and later, and to a lesser extent, to increase citizen participation and consultation. Much of this reconstitution has been realized through public interest litigation critical of agri-biotech regulation brought about by urban civil society groups, a legal tool that may no longer be applied under India's proposed National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 331
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines [J].
Aerni, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (06) :1123-1137
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, REPORT TASK FORCE AP
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT POLITICS GENETIC
[4]   Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy [J].
Bauer, MW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2005, 17 (01) :5-22
[5]  
Bernauer Thomas., 2003, Genes, Trade, and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology
[6]  
Brahmi P, 2004, CURR SCI INDIA, V86, P392
[7]   Exploring the links between science, risk, uncertainty, and ethics in regulatory controversies about genetically modified crops [J].
Carr, S ;
Levidow, L .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2000, 12 (01) :29-39
[9]  
Clapp J., 2006, Journal of Environment & Development, V15, P3, DOI 10.1177/1070496505285443
[10]  
Curtis K. R., 2004, AgBioForum, V7, P70