Evaluating an environmental right: Information disclosure, public comment, and government decision making in Ontario

被引:3
作者
Deaton, B. James [1 ]
Lintner, Anastasia M. [2 ]
Harrington, Donna R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Agr Coll, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Coll Management & Econ, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Econ, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE | 2008年 / 56卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00129.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In 1993, the Ontario government enacted the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR). The EBR guarantees residents of the province, among other things, the right to comment on permit requests to take water and to discharge into the air and a guarantee that these comments are taken into account in the decision to approve or deny a permit. We model the firm's decision to request a permit, a resident's decision to provide public comment, and the government's decision to approve or deny permit requests to use water or air. Our examination of 1,000 government decisions regarding permit requests leads to two key findings: (1) few permit requests receive any public comment; and (2) to the extent that the public does comment, we find no empirical evidence that comments affect the likelihood that the government will deny a permit request. Our theoretical model anticipates the first result: there are few comments observed for permit applications, because each individual has an incentive to undercontribute to the provision of a public good. The second result did not support the theoretical argument we advance: government, acting to maximize social welfare, takes public concern as a signal of environmental damage.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 294
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ando AW, 2003, PUBLIC CHOICE, V114, P137
[2]   Waiting to be protected under the endangered species act: The political economy of regulatory delay [J].
Ando, AW .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1999, 42 (01) :29-60
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NATURAL CAPITALISM
[5]  
Buchanan J.M., 1968, DEMAND SUPPLY PUBLIC
[6]  
Cameron AC, 1998, Regression Analysis of Count Data
[7]  
Cornes RichardSandler., 1996, THEORY EXTERNALITIES, V2nd
[8]  
*ECO, 2003, ONT ENV BILL RIGHTS
[9]   POLLUTION AS NEWS - MEDIA AND STOCK-MARKET REACTIONS TO THE TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY DATA [J].
HAMILTON, JT .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (01) :98-113
[10]   Incentives for pollution abatement: Regulation, regulatory threats, and non-governmental pressures [J].
Harrison, K ;
Antweiler, W .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 22 (03) :361-382