Ultra-low-dose MDCT of the chest: Influence on automated lung nodule detection

被引:30
作者
Lee, Ji Young [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Myung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Chin A. [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Kyung Soo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
lung neoplasm; CT; computed tomography (CT); radiation exposure; computer; diagnostic aid;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2008.9.2.95
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between CT dose and the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system, and to determine how best to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation while maintaining sufficient image quality for automated lung nodule detection, by the use of lung cancer screening CT. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five asymptomatic volunteers participated in the study. Each volunteer underwent a low-dose CT scan without contrast enhancement (multidetector CT with 16 detector rows, 1.25 mm section thickness, 120 kVp, beam pitch 1.35, 0.6 second rotation time, with 1.25 mm thickness reconstruction at 1.25 mm intervals) using four different amperages 32, 16, 8, and 4 mAs. All series were analyzed using a commercially available CAD system for automatic lung nodule detection and the results were reviewed by a consensus reading by two radiologists. The McNemar test and Kappa analysis were used to compare differences in terms of the abilities to detect pulmonary nodules. Results: A total of 78 non-calcified true nodules were visualized in the 25 study subjects. The sensitivities for nodule detection were as follows: 72% at 32 mAs, 64% at 16 mAs, 59% at 8 mAs, and 40% at 4 mAs. Although the overall nodule-detecting performance was best at 32 mAs, no significant difference in nodule detectability was observed between scans at 16 mAs or 8 mAs versus 32 mAs. However, scans performed at 4 mAs were significantly inferior to those performed at 32 mAs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Reducing the radiation dose (i.e. reducing the amperage) lowers lung nodule detectability by CAD. However, relatively low dose scans were found to be acceptable and to cause no significant reduction in nodule detectability versus usual low-dose CT.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 101
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Computerized scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography images for lung cancer screening [J].
Arimura, H ;
Katsuragawa, S ;
Suzuki, K ;
Li, F ;
Shiraishi, J ;
Sone, S ;
Doi, K .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (06) :617-629
[2]   Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program [J].
Armato, SG ;
Roy, AS ;
MacMahon, H ;
Li, F ;
Doi, K ;
Sone, S ;
Altman, MB .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) :337-346
[3]   Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: Effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance [J].
Awai, K ;
Murao, K ;
Ozawa, A ;
Komi, M ;
Hayakawa, H ;
Hori, S ;
Nishimura, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :347-352
[4]   Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer [J].
Brenner, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :440-445
[5]   Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT in Korea: Experiences at the Samsung Medical Center [J].
Chong, SM ;
Lee, KS ;
Chung, MJ ;
Kim, TS ;
Kim, H ;
Kwon, OJ ;
Choi, YH ;
Rhee, CH .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 20 (03) :402-408
[6]  
Flehinger B J, 1994, Chest Surg Clin N Am, V4, P1
[7]   THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL-TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL FROM EARLY LUNG-CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR SCREENING [J].
FLEHINGER, BJ ;
KIMMEL, M ;
MELAMED, MR .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (04) :1013-1018
[8]   Lung nodule detection with ultra-low-dose CT in routine follow-up of cancer patients [J].
Gergely, I ;
Neumann, C ;
Reiger, F ;
Dorffner, R .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2005, 177 (08) :1077-1083
[9]   Automated lung nodule detection at low-dose CT: Preliminary experience [J].
Goo, JM ;
Lee, JW ;
Lee, HJ ;
Kim, S ;
Kim, JH ;
Im, JG .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 4 (04) :211-216
[10]  
Henschke CI, 2000, CANCER, V89, P2474