Evolution of in-group favoritism

被引:152
|
作者
Fu, Feng [1 ,4 ]
Tarnita, Corina E. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Christakis, Nicholas A. [2 ,4 ,7 ]
Wang, Long [3 ]
Rand, David G. [1 ,8 ]
Nowak, Martin A. [1 ,6 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Program Evolutionary Dynam, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, State Key Lab Turbulence & Complex Syst, Ctr Syst & Control, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Harvard Soc Fellows, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Dept Sociol, Fac Arts & Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[8] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[9] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2012年 / 2卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PAROCHIAL ALTRUISM; GROUP SELECTION; COOPERATION; INDIVIDUALS; COEVOLUTION; MIGRATION; RULE; KIN;
D O I
10.1038/srep00460
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In-group favoritism is a central aspect of human behavior. People often help members of their own group more than members of other groups. Here we propose a mathematical framework for the evolution of in-group favoritism from a continuum of strategies. Unlike previous models, we do not pre-suppose that players never cooperate with out-group members. Instead, we determine the conditions under which preferential in-group cooperation emerges, and also explore situations where preferential out-group helping could evolve. Our approach is not based on explicit intergroup conflict, but instead uses evolutionary set theory. People can move between sets. Successful sets attract members, and successful strategies gain imitators. Individuals can employ different strategies when interacting with in-group versus out-group members. Our framework also allows us to implement different games for these two types of interactions. We prove general results and derive specific conditions for the evolution of cooperation based on in-group favoritism.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust and in-group favoritism in a culture of crime
    Meier, Stephan
    Pierce, Lamar
    Vaccaro, Antonino
    La Cara, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 132 : 78 - 92
  • [2] Time Pressure and In-group Favoritism in a Minimal Group Paradigm
    Maeda, Kaede
    Hashimoto, Hirofumi
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [3] THE EFFECT OF IN-GROUP FAVORITISM ON THE COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS' OPINIONS
    Alizadeh, Meysam
    Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio
    Crooks, Andrew
    ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (1-2):
  • [4] Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness
    Jordan, Jillian J.
    McAuliffe, Katherine
    Warneken, Felix
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (35) : 12710 - 12715
  • [5] Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict
    Konrad, Kai A.
    Morath, Florian
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 306 : 61 - 67
  • [7] The development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism
    Huang, Yifan
    Zhang, Yinling
    Hu, Xinmu
    Yang, Wenqi
    Mai, Xiaoqin
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 251
  • [9] Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America
    Fiedler, Susann
    Hellmann, Dshamilja Marie
    Dorrough, Angela Rachael
    Gloeckner, Andreas
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 13 (01): : 42 - 60
  • [10] Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation
    Masuda, Naoki
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 311 : 8 - 18