Impact of Pharmacy Intervention on Prior Authorization Success and Efficiency at a University Medical Center

被引:16
作者
Cutler, Timothy [1 ]
She, Yifan [1 ]
Barca, Jason [1 ]
Lester, Shawn [1 ]
Xing, Guibo [3 ]
Patel, Jigna [2 ]
Melnikow, Joy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis Hlth Syst, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Healthcare Policy & Res, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.10.1167
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Prior authorizations (PAs) may improve appropriate use of prescription medications. Despite potential savings for health insurance plans, the PA process is time consuming for the ordering provider, pharmacy, and patient. The UC Davis Health System (UCDHS) has created a centralized pharmacy-run clinic PA process. OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean PA processing time between the new centralized clinic and usual care and provide secondary endpoints for PA approval rates, time to prescription fill, time to prescription pick-up, total staff time, and estimated labor costs. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study comparing sequential PA requests at the UCDHS centralized clinic (intervention) and other UCDHS clinics (usual care) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to compare dichotomous outcomes (approval/denial rates) between the 2 groups, controlling for insurance type. A generalized linear model was applied for comparing the continuous outcomes (PA process time, time to first fill, time to pick-up, and cost) with insurance type as covariate. RESULTS: For the intervention group, 47 PAs were evaluated, and 77 PAs were evaluated in the usual care group. The average PA process time was 0.53 days for the intervention group versus 7.02 days for usual care (P<0.001), and the PA approval rate was 93% for the intervention group versus 68% for usual care (P<0.002). The mean time to fill was 2.49 days and 5.52 days for the intervention and usual care clinics, respectively (P=0.02). The pick-up percentage was 75% versus 52% for intervention and usual care, respectively (P<0.001). The intervention clinic spent a significantly lower mean time processing PAs (15 minutes vs. 64 minutes) compared with the usual care clinics (P<0.001). It is estimated that the mean total labor cost per PA at the intervention clinic was $11.50 compared with $37.50 for the usual care clinics (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy-led interventions in PA processing resulted in a statistically significant benefit in improving time to PA approval, time to first fill, and time to pick-up. Copyright (C) 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1171
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] American Medical Association, 2011, STAND PRIOR AUTH PRO
  • [2] What Does It Cost Physician Practices To Interact With Health Insurance Plans?
    Casalino, Lawrence P.
    Nicholson, Sean
    Gans, David N.
    Hammons, Terry
    Morra, Dante
    Karrison, Theodore
    Levinson, Wendy
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (04) : W533 - W543
  • [3] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, NAT HLTH EXP PROJ 20
  • [4] Lu CY, 2011, PSYCHIAT SERV, V62, P186, DOI 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0186
  • [5] The Impact of Prior Authorization Requirements on Primary Care Physicians' Offices: Report of Two Parallel Network Studies
    Morley, Christopher P.
    Badolato, David J.
    Hickner, John
    Epling, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 93 - 95
  • [6] Uncompensated Medical Provider Costs Associated with Prior Authorization for Prescription Medications in an HIV Clinic
    Raper, James L.
    Willig, James H.
    Lin, Hui-Yi
    Allison, Jeroan J.
    Broner, M. Bennet
    Mugavero, Michael J.
    Saag, Michael S.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 51 (06) : 718 - 724
  • [7] Assessment of Changes in Utilization of Health-Care Services After Implementation of a Prior Authorization Policy for Atypical Antipsychotic Agents
    Walthour, Amy
    Seymour, Lynne
    Tackett, Randall
    Perri, Matthew
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 44 (05) : 809 - 818