Trends in study design and the statistical methods employed in a leading general medicine journal

被引:11
|
作者
Gosho, M. [1 ]
Sato, Y. [2 ]
Nagashima, K. [2 ]
Takahashi, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Dept Clin Trial & Clin Epidemiol, Fac Med, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ, Dept Global Clin Res, Grad Sch Med, Chiba, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Chiba, Japan
关键词
adaptive design; interventional study; missing data; New England Journal of Medicine; observational study; ARTICLES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/jcpt.12605
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
What is known and objectiveStudy design and statistical methods have become core components of medical research, and the methodology has become more multifaceted and complicated over time. The study of the comprehensive details and current trends of study design and statistical methods is required to support the future implementation of well-planned clinical studies providing information about evidence-based medicine. Our purpose was to illustrate study design and statistical methods employed in recent medical literature. MethodsThis was an extension study of Sato etal. (N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1086-1087), which reviewed 238 articles published in 2015 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and briefly summarized the statistical methods employed in NEJM. Using the same database, we performed a new investigation of the detailed trends in study design and individual statistical methods that were not reported in the Sato study. Results and discussionDue to the CONSORT statement, prespecification and justification of sample size are obligatory in planning intervention studies. Although standard survival methods (eg Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression model) were most frequently applied, the Gray test and Fine-Gray proportional hazard model for considering competing risks were sometimes used for a more valid statistical inference. With respect to handling missing data, model-based methods, which are valid for missing-at-random data, were more frequently used than single imputation methods. These methods are not recommended as a primary analysis, but they have been applied in many clinical trials. Group sequential design with interim analyses was one of the standard designs, and novel design, such as adaptive dose selection and sample size re-estimation, was sometimes employed in NEJM. What is new and conclusionModel-based approaches for handling missing data should replace single imputation methods for primary analysis in the light of the information found in some publications. Use of adaptive design with interim analyses is increasing after the presentation of the FDA guidance for adaptive design.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 44
页数:9
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Research design and statistical methods in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS)
    Akhtar, Sohail
    Shah, Syed Wadood Ali
    Rafiq, M.
    Khan, Ajmal
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (01) : 151 - 154
  • [2] Identifying Factors Leading to Harm in English General Practices: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Patient Experiences Integrating Structural Equation Modeling and Qualitative Content Analysis
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
    Mounce, Luke T. A.
    Valderas, Jose Maria
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (01) : E20 - E27