Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory in Cancer Patients

被引:15
作者
Paramita, Nurul [1 ,2 ]
Nusdwinuringtyas, Nury [1 ]
Nuhonni, Siti Annisa [1 ]
Atmakusuma, Tubagus Djumhana [3 ]
Ismail, R. Irawati [4 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [5 ]
Cleeland, Charles S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Med Physiol, Jalan Salemba Raya 6, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hosp, Hematol & Med Oncol Div, Dept Internal Med,Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Jakarta, Indonesia
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Internal Med, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CRF; fatigue; assessment; validity; reliability; Indonesia; PERFORMANCE STATUS; VALIDATION; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; CRITERIA; QUALITY; SCALE; BFI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in cancer patients. Short but good assessment is essential to detect and manage this symptom. Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a valid and reliable short instrument to assess cancer-related fatigue. Objective. To examine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian BFI. Methods. Forward and backward translation approach, followed by cognitive debriefing process, was done to develop Indonesian BFI. One hundred twenty-one consecutive adult outpatients with cancer who are willing to participate in this study filled in Indonesian BFI along with the Medical Outcome Study Quality of Life Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36). Demographic and health data were collected. Results. The Indonesian BFI had an overall Cronbach's alpha for the nine items of 0.956. The results of the factor analysis suggested a one-factor solution, supporting the hypothesis of unidimensionality of the Indonesian BFI. The Indonesian BFI score was compared with MOS SF-36 subscale to evaluate convergent validity. An expected inverse correlation between Indonesian BFI and all domains of MOS SF-36 was observed (r = -0.388 to -0.676; P < 0.0000). Discriminant validity analysis showed that the Indonesian BFI mean score significantly increased with increasing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status values (P = 0.000). Conclusion. Indonesian BFI is a reliable and valid instrument for Indonesian cancer patients. (C) 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 751
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, Cancer Key Facts
  • [2] Cancer-related fatigue in Italian cancer patients: validation of the Italian version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
    Catania, Gianluca
    Bell, Carol
    Ottonelli, Simona
    Marchetti, Monia
    Bryce, Jane
    Grossi, Alberto
    Costantini, Massimo
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (02) : 413 - 419
  • [3] Campos MPD, 2011, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V57, P211
  • [4] The relationship between cancer-related fatigue and patient satisfaction with quality of life in cancer
    Gupta, Digant
    Lis, Christopher G.
    Grutsch, James F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 34 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [5] Measurement of Fatigue in Cancer Patients: Development and Validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory
    D. M. Hann
    P. B. Jacobsen
    L. M. Azzarello
    S. C. Martin
    S. L. Curran
    K. K. Fields
    H. Greenberg
    G. Lyman
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 1998, 7 (4) : 301 - 310
  • [6] Cancer-related fatigue: The scale of the problem
    Hofman, Maarten
    Ryan, Julie L.
    Figueroa-Moseley, Colmar D.
    Jean-Pierre, Pascal
    Morrow, Gary R.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 : 4 - 10
  • [7] THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .3. TESTS OF DATA QUALITY, SCALING ASSUMPTIONS, AND RELIABILITY ACROSS DIVERSE PATIENT GROUPS
    MCHORNEY, CA
    WARE, JE
    LU, JFR
    SHERBOURNE, CD
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (01) : 40 - 66
  • [8] Mendoza TR, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V85, P1186, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1186::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-N
  • [10] TOXICITY AND RESPONSE CRITERIA OF THE EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP
    OKEN, MM
    CREECH, RH
    TORMEY, DC
    HORTON, J
    DAVIS, TE
    MCFADDEN, ET
    CARBONE, PP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1982, 5 (06): : 649 - 655