Criteria for Priority-setting in Iran Basic Health Insurance Package: Exploring the Perceptions of Health Insurance Experts

被引:0
|
作者
Dehnavieh, Reza [1 ]
Rashidian, Arash [2 ]
Maleki, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Tabibi, Seyedjamal Aldin [3 ]
Pour, Hosein Ibrahimi [4 ]
Hekmat, Somayeh Noori
机构
[1] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Management & Med Informat Sch, Hlth Serv Management Dept, Kerman, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth & Management, Mashhad, Iran
来源
HEALTHMED | 2011年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
Basic Health Insurance Package; Priority Setting; Iran; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; UGANDA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background : Determining Services of Basic Health Insurance Package has been the big challenge of Insurance Organizations in Iran. These organizations have no choice to identify the proper criteria to formulate the insurance package services, given the limited resources. Objectives: This research is an attempt to tackle this issue by determining the necessary criteria and their importance for defining Basic Healthcare Insurance Package in Iran. Methods and material: This is a qualitative, descriptive and cross sectional study which has been conducted in 2010. This study has been carried out in two steps. In the first step, a sample of 20 professionals was selected. A sample of professionals was selected using purposeful and snowball based methods, who were then individually interviewed. The whole interviews were digitally recorded, and were transcribed and analyzed later to obtain the criteria. In the second step, a questionnaire was sent to experts from the six organizations involved with health insurance. Purposeful and Snowball sampling techniques were used to identify 52 health insurance experts. The SPSS software was used to analyze the collected data. Results: Practicability, stockholders and politicians' perspectives, cost of interventions and belonged to the vulnerable group criteria are playing a major role in the provided package of health care services by health insurance organizations in Iran in the current situation. Cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, quality of evidence and equity of access are the most important criteria in the ideal situation. Conclusion: There is a big difference between the criteria which have been used to set the priority in the current situation with what it should be in the criteria in the ideal situation in Iran. Given the differences in the role of priority setting for the current and ideal situation, it is necessary to apply a policy that can reduce the present gap.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury
    Menon, Devidas
    Stafinski, Tania
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (03) : 282 - 293
  • [42] Scoping literature review on the basic health benefit package and its determinant criteria
    Hayati, Ramin
    Bastani, Peivand
    Kabir, Mohammad Javad
    Kavosi, Zahra
    Sobhani, Ghasem
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2018, 14
  • [43] Applying DALY to assessing national health insurance performance: the relationship between the national health insurance expenditures and the burden of disease measures in Iran
    Russel, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 20 (02) : 89 - 98
  • [44] Policy levers and priority-setting in universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of healthcare financing agenda setting in Kenya
    Tessa Oraro-Lawrence
    Kaspar Wyss
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [45] Unique challenges for health equity in Latin America: situating the roles of priority-setting and judicial enforcement
    Yamin, Alicia Ely
    Pichon-Riviere, Andres
    Bergallo, Paola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [46] Factors Influencing Basic and Complementary Health Insurance Purchasing Decisions in Iran: Analysis of Data From a National Survey
    Nosratnejad, Shirin
    Rashidian, Arash
    Mehrara, Mohsen
    Jafari, Nahid
    Moeeni, Maryam
    Babamohamadi, Hassan
    WORLD MEDICAL & HEALTH POLICY, 2016, 8 (02): : 179 - 196
  • [47] Policy levers and priority-setting in universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of healthcare financing agenda setting in Kenya
    Oraro-Lawrence, Tessa
    Wyss, Kaspar
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [48] The art and science of priority-setting: assessing the value of Public Health England's Prioritization Framework
    Maniatopoulos, G.
    Hunter, D. J.
    Gray, J.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (03) : 625 - 631
  • [49] Unique challenges for health equity in Latin America: situating the roles of priority-setting and judicial enforcement
    Alicia Ely Yamin
    Andrés Pichon-Riviere
    Paola Bergallo
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 18
  • [50] Analysis of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in the Health Insurance Market of Iran
    Haddad, GholamReza Keshavarz
    Anbaji, Mahdieh Zomorrodi
    GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2010, 35 (04) : 581 - 599