Criteria for Priority-setting in Iran Basic Health Insurance Package: Exploring the Perceptions of Health Insurance Experts

被引:0
|
作者
Dehnavieh, Reza [1 ]
Rashidian, Arash [2 ]
Maleki, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Tabibi, Seyedjamal Aldin [3 ]
Pour, Hosein Ibrahimi [4 ]
Hekmat, Somayeh Noori
机构
[1] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Management & Med Informat Sch, Hlth Serv Management Dept, Kerman, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth & Management, Mashhad, Iran
来源
HEALTHMED | 2011年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
Basic Health Insurance Package; Priority Setting; Iran; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; UGANDA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background : Determining Services of Basic Health Insurance Package has been the big challenge of Insurance Organizations in Iran. These organizations have no choice to identify the proper criteria to formulate the insurance package services, given the limited resources. Objectives: This research is an attempt to tackle this issue by determining the necessary criteria and their importance for defining Basic Healthcare Insurance Package in Iran. Methods and material: This is a qualitative, descriptive and cross sectional study which has been conducted in 2010. This study has been carried out in two steps. In the first step, a sample of 20 professionals was selected. A sample of professionals was selected using purposeful and snowball based methods, who were then individually interviewed. The whole interviews were digitally recorded, and were transcribed and analyzed later to obtain the criteria. In the second step, a questionnaire was sent to experts from the six organizations involved with health insurance. Purposeful and Snowball sampling techniques were used to identify 52 health insurance experts. The SPSS software was used to analyze the collected data. Results: Practicability, stockholders and politicians' perspectives, cost of interventions and belonged to the vulnerable group criteria are playing a major role in the provided package of health care services by health insurance organizations in Iran in the current situation. Cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, quality of evidence and equity of access are the most important criteria in the ideal situation. Conclusion: There is a big difference between the criteria which have been used to set the priority in the current situation with what it should be in the criteria in the ideal situation in Iran. Given the differences in the role of priority setting for the current and ideal situation, it is necessary to apply a policy that can reduce the present gap.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Priority-setting, rationing and cost-effectiveness in the German health care system
    Oduncu, Fuat S.
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 16 (03) : 327 - 339
  • [32] Health policy and systems research priority-setting exercise in Ethiopia: a collaborative approach
    Amare, Getasew
    Endehabtu, Berhanu Fikadie
    Atnafu, Asmamaw
    Derseh, Lemma
    Gurmu, Kassu Ketema
    Getachew, Theodros
    Tilahun, Binyam
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [33] Health-care needs and shared decision-making in priority-setting
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Sandman, Lars
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 18 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [34] Priority setting in Indigenous health: assessing priority setting process and criteria that should guide the health system to improve Indigenous Australian health
    Michael E Otim
    Margaret Kelaher
    Ian P Anderson
    Chris M Doran
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 13
  • [35] Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: Evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework
    Maluka, Stephen
    Kamuzora, Peter
    Sebastian, Miguel San
    Byskov, Jens
    Olsen, Oystein E.
    Shayo, Elizabeth
    Ndawi, Benedict
    Hurtig, Anna-Karin
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (04) : 751 - 759
  • [36] Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
    Kaur, Gunjeet
    Prinja, Shankar
    Lakshmi, P. V. M.
    Downey, Laura
    Sharma, Deepshikha
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (06) : 474 - 483
  • [37] Constructing citizen engagement in health research priority-setting to attend to dynamics of power and difference
    Pratt, Bridget
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2019, 19 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [38] Challenges of a Large Health Insurance Organization in Iran: A Qualitative Study
    Marnani, Ahmad Barati
    Teymourzadeh, Ehsan
    Bahadori, Mohammadkarim
    Ravangard, Ramin
    Pour, Jalal Saeid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ON INTERNAL MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 4 (06) : 1050 - 1062
  • [39] Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
    Norheim, Ole F.
    Baltussen, Rob
    Johri, Mira
    Chisholm, Dan
    Nord, Erik
    Brock, Dan W.
    Carlsson, Per
    Cookson, Richard
    Daniels, Norman
    Danis, Marion
    Fleurbaey, Marc
    Johansson, Kjell A.
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Mbeeli, Thomas
    Rao, Krishna D.
    Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres
    Wikler, Dan
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2014, 12
  • [40] Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community
    Tugendhaft, Aviva
    Hofman, Karen
    Danis, Marion
    Kahn, Kathleen
    Erzse, Agnes
    Twine, Rhian
    Gold, Marthe
    Christofides, Nicola
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2021, 36 (08) : 1279 - 1291