How CO2-Storage Mechanisms Are Different in Organic Shale: Characterization and Simulation Studies

被引:0
作者
Pu, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yuhe [3 ]
Li, Yinghui [4 ]
机构
[1] InPetro Technol, Houston, TX 77036 USA
[2] Univ North Dakota, Petr Engn, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ Qatar, Petr Engn, Doha, Qatar
[4] InPetro Technol, Houston, TX USA
来源
SPE JOURNAL | 2018年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
CARBON-DIOXIDE STORAGE; PHASE-BEHAVIOR; GAS-RESERVOIRS; CO2; STORAGE; ADSORPTION; MODEL; OIL; PRESSURE; CAPACITY; MEDIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
Widely distributed organic-rich shales are being considered as one of the important carbon-storage targets, owing to three differentiators compared with conventional reservoirs and saline aquifers: (1) trapping of a significant amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) permanently; (2) kerogen-rich shale's higher affinity of CO2; and (3) existing well and pipeline infrastructure, especially that in the vicinity of existing power or chemical plants. The incapability to model capillarity with the consideration of imperative pore-size-distribution (PSD) characteristics by use of commercial software may lead to inaccurate modeling of CO2 injection in organic shale. We develop a novel approach to examine how PSD would alter phase and flow behavior under nanopore confinements. We incorporate adsorption behavior with a local density-optimization algorithm designed for multicomponent interactions to adsorption sites for a full spectrum of reservoir pressures of interests. This feature elevates the limitation of the Langinuir isotherm model, allowing us to understand the storage and sieving capabilities for a CO2/N-2 flue-gas system with remaining reservoir fluids. Taking PSD data of Bakken shale, we perform a core-scale simulation study of CO2/N-2 flue-gas injection and reveal the differences between CO2 injection/storage in organic shales and conventional rocks on the basis of numerical modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 671
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Afonja G, 2012, P SPETT 2012 EN C EX, DOI [10.2118/158220-MS, DOI 10.2118/158220-MS]
[2]   Geologic factors controlling CO2 storage capacity and permanence:: case studies based on experience with heterogeneity in oil and gas reservoirs applied to CO2 storage [J].
Ambrose, W. A. ;
Lakshminarasimhan, S. ;
Holtz, M. H. ;
Nunez-Lopez, V. ;
Hovorka, S. D. ;
Duncan, I. .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2008, 54 (08) :1619-1633
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CARBON SEQUESTRATION
[4]   CARS Diagnostics of Molecular Media under Nanoporous Confinement [J].
Arakcheev, V. G. ;
Valeev, A. A. ;
Morozov, V. B. ;
Olenin, A. N. .
LASER PHYSICS, 2008, 18 (12) :1451-1458
[5]   CO2 storage in geological media:: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment [J].
Bachu, Stefan .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (02) :254-273
[6]  
Boosari S.S.H., 2015, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection 03, P7, DOI [10.4236/gep.2015.31002, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2015.31002]
[7]   Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers [J].
Brunauer, S ;
Emmett, PH ;
Teller, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1938, 60 :309-319
[8]   Carbon dioxide storage potential of shales [J].
Busch, Andreas ;
Alles, Sascha ;
Gensterblum, Yves ;
Prinz, Dirk ;
Dewhurst, David N. ;
Raven, Mark D. ;
Stanjek, Helge ;
Krooss, Bernhard M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (03) :297-308
[9]   Adsorption and desorption of carbon dioxide onto and from activated carbon at high pressures [J].
Chen, JH ;
Wong, DSH ;
Tan, CS ;
Subramanian, R ;
Lira, CT ;
Orth, M .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1997, 36 (07) :2808-2815
[10]   Variation in micropore capacity and size distribution with composition in bituminous coal of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin - Implications for coalbed methane potential [J].
Clarkson, CR ;
Bustin, RM .
FUEL, 1996, 75 (13) :1483-1498