Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal

被引：39

作者：

Bond, Alan J. ^{[1
]}

Dockerty, Trudie ^{[1
]}

Lovett, Andrew ^{[1
]}

Riche, Andrew B. ^{[2
]}

Haughton, Alison J. ^{[2
]}

Bohan, David A. ^{[2
]}

Sage, Rufus B. ^{[3
]}

Shield, Ian F. ^{[2
]}

Finch, Jon W. ^{[4
]}

Turner, Martin M. ^{[5
]}

Karp, Angela ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England

[2] Rothamsted Res, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England

[3] Game & Wildlife Conservat Trust, Fordingbridge SP6 1EF, England

[4] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England

[5] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England

来源：

REGIONAL STUDIES | 2011年 / 45卷 / 08期

关键词：

Sustainability Appraisal; Biomass crops; Constraints mapping; Learning; Analytic-deliberative; Pluralism; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; UK; REFLECTIONS; METHODOLOGY; SCENARIOS; SCIENCE; SEA;

D O I：

10.1080/00343404.2010.485181

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

BOND A. J., DOCKERTY T., LOVETT A., RICHE A. B., HAUGHTON A. J., BOHAN D. A., SAGE R. B., SHIELD I. F., FINCH J. W., TURNER M. M. and KARP A. Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in Sustainability Appraisal, Regional Studies. The effectiveness of Sustainability Appraisal is highly contested because of the value-based nature of the assumed goal ( sustainable development), because effectiveness itself can be determined through different theoretical framings, and because good governance does not guarantee sustainable outcomes. Drawing on learning derived from the literature and a case study examining biomass crop planting on a regional scale in England, an approach for managing the Sustainability Appraisal development and application process is proposed. This incorporates analytic-deliberative techniques as the basis for more pluralism, combined with constraints mapping. Such an approach, it is suggested, can better accommodate multiple framings.

引用

页码：1157 / 1170

页数：14

共 79 条

[11] A holistic approach to sustainability based on pluralism stewardship [J].

Barrett, CB ;

Grizzle, R .

ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 1999, 21 (01) :23-42

[12] The theory of environmental impact assessment: Implicit models of policy making [J].

Bartlett, RV ;

Kurian, PA .

POLICY AND POLITICS, 1999, 27 (04) :415-433

[13] Exploring the relation between evidence and decision-making - A political-administrative approach to health impact assessment [J].

Bekker, MPM ;

Putters, K ;

Van der Grinten, TED .

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2004, 24 (02) :139-149

[14]

Bell S., 2008, SUSTAINABILITY INDIC

[15]

Benson JF., 2003, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V21, P261, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154603781766185

[16]

Bond A., 2009, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V27, P321, DOI DOI 10.3152/146155109X479422

[17]

BOND AJ, 2003, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V21, P266

[18] Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions [J].

Burgess, Jacquelin ;

Stirling, Andy ;

Clark, Judy ;

Davies, Gail ;

Eames, Malcolm ;

Staley, Kristina ;

Williamson, Suzanne .

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (03) :299-322

[19] Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture [J].

Butler, S. J. ;

Vickery, J. A. ;

Norris, K. .

SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5810) :381-384

[20]

Caldwell LyntonK., 1991, IMPACT ASSESSMENT B, V9, P81, DOI DOI 10.1080/07349165.1991.9726069

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →