Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology

被引:27
|
作者
Chen, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zou, Fengwei [3 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Xinwei [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [5 ]
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sir Run Run Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Medtronic Plc, CRHF Div, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electrocardiogram; intracardiac electrogram; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal only pacing; mapping;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP. Methods and Results LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, Delta LV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, Delta LV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%. Conclusions Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 457
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bundle Branch Re-Entrant Ventricular Tachycardia During Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (10) : 1324 - 1325
  • [42] New criterion to determine left bundle branch capture on the basis of individualized His bundle or right ventricular septal pacing
    Qian, Zhiyong
    Xue, Siyuan
    Zou, Fengwei
    Qin, Chaotong
    Wang, Yao
    Zhang, Xinwei
    Qiu, Yuanhao
    Wu, Hongping
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Zou, Jiangang
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (12) : 1984 - 1992
  • [43] The electrophysiological characteristics and meanings in left bundle branch pacing based on unipolar and bipolar pacing
    Zeng, Weifang
    Jiang, Longfu
    Zhang, Lu
    Wu, Hao
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2023, 77 : 46 - 50
  • [44] Retrograde Conduction in Left Bundle Branch Block Insights From Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Basil, William
    Ganesan, Vithiya
    Syed, Thabish
    Ramalingam, Vadivelu
    Mariappan, Selvaganesh
    Anand, Vijesh
    Murugan, Senthil
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (08) : 1885 - 1895
  • [45] Efficacy of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with heart failure after right ventricular pacing
    Qian, Zhiyong
    Wang, Yao
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Qiu, Yuanhao
    Wu, Hongping
    Zhou, Weihua
    Zou, Jiangang
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (03): : 472 - 480
  • [46] Impacts of Left Bundle/Peri-Left Bundle Pacing on Left Ventricular Contraction
    Hasumi, Eriko
    Fujiu, Katsuhito
    Nakanishi, Koki
    Komuro, Issei
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (09) : 1965 - 1967
  • [47] Interventricular Septal Hematoma With Pericardium Effusion After Left Bundle Branch Pacing Implantation
    Chen, Xueying
    Lu, Hao
    Xu, Lili
    Chen, Haiyan
    Xu, Ye
    Xu, Shikun
    Wang, Qibing
    Qian, Juying
    Ge, Junbo
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 9 (01) : 142 - 144
  • [48] A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing left bundle branch pacing, his bundle branch pacing, and right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block
    Zhang, Yue
    Jia, Yuan
    Liu, Jia
    Du, Rongpin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [49] Left Bundle Branch Pacing Impact on QRS Amplitude in Different Pacing Voltages
    Wang, Shengchan
    Geng, Jie
    Yang, Wen
    Jiang, Zhixin
    Zhou, Xiujuan
    Jiang, Wanying
    Zhang, Shigeng
    Shan, Qijun
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, : 762 - 770
  • [50] Left bundle branch pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy
    L. M. Rademakers
    J. L. P. M. van den Broek
    F. A. Bracke
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2023, 31 : 140 - 149