Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology

被引:27
|
作者
Chen, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zou, Fengwei [3 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Xinwei [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [5 ]
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sir Run Run Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Medtronic Plc, CRHF Div, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electrocardiogram; intracardiac electrogram; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal only pacing; mapping;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP. Methods and Results LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, Delta LV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, Delta LV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%. Conclusions Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 457
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure
    Paluszkiewicz, Patrycja
    Martuszewski, Adrian
    Radziejewska, Jadwiga
    Zawadzki, Jacek
    Smereka, Jacek
    Gajek, Jacek
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [32] New-Onset Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Ganesan, Vithiya
    Nagalingam, Sudharshana
    Ramalingam, Vadivelu
    Mariappan, Selvaganesh
    Moghal, Habibullah
    Murugan, Senthil
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Joseph, Riya
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (11) : 2494 - 2502
  • [33] Left bundle branch pacing preserved left ventricular myocardial work in patients with bradycardia
    Chen, Huang-Chung
    Liu, Wen-Hao
    Chen, Yung-Lung
    Lee, Wei-Chieh
    Fang, Yen-Nan
    Chong, Shaur-Zheng
    Chen, Mien-Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [34] Recovery of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy with Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Dogan, Mert
    Canpolat, Ugur
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 52 (05): : 357 - 361
  • [35] Electrophysiological characteristics and possible mechanism of bipolar pacing in left bundle branch pacing
    Wu, Hao
    Jiang, Longfu
    Shen, Jiabo
    Zhang, Lu
    Zhong, Jinyan
    Zhuo, Shanshan
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (12) : 2019 - 2026
  • [36] A diagnostic dilemma of left bundle branch pacing
    Iida, Yoji
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (06) : 1491 - 1494
  • [37] Extraction of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Lead
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 903 - 904
  • [38] Durability of left bundle branch area pacing
    Mehta, Nikhil A.
    Saqi, Bilal
    Sabzwari, Syed R. A.
    Gupta, Rahul
    Vyas, Apurva
    Gordon, Jeffrey
    Cossu, Sergio
    Nazir, Talha
    Freudenberger, Ronald
    Bozorgnia, Babak
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1529 - 1536
  • [39] Electrocardiography guided left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2021, 68 : 11 - 13
  • [40] Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Perfect Compromise?
    Raymond-Paquin, Alexandre
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 10 (04) : 241 - 243