Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology

被引:27
|
作者
Chen, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zou, Fengwei [3 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Xinwei [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [5 ]
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sir Run Run Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Medtronic Plc, CRHF Div, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electrocardiogram; intracardiac electrogram; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal only pacing; mapping;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP. Methods and Results LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, Delta LV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, Delta LV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%. Conclusions Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 457
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Effect on Left Ventricular Function Between Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing
    Mao, Yu
    Xie, Yuan
    Tang, Jiani
    Shen, Yujing
    Liu, Yang
    Sun, Bing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 : 4007 - 4016
  • [22] Left bundle branch pacing guide by uninterrupted recording of intrinsic filtered and unfiltered intracardiac electrograms
    Shen, Jiabo
    Jiang, Longfu
    Li, Hengdong
    Wu, Hao
    Pan, Lifang
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2024, 86
  • [23] Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Katta, Maanya Rajasree
    Abouzid, Mohamed Riad Abdelgawad
    Hameed, Maha
    Kaur, Jasneet
    Balasubramanian, Suryakumar
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2025, 33 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [24] Electrophysiological characteristics of septal perforation during left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Basil, William
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (05) : 728 - 734
  • [25] Observations of interventricular septal behavior during left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Ganesan, Vidhya
    Anand, Vijesh
    Vadivelu, Ramalingam
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Mariappan, Selvaganesh
    Murugan, Senthil
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (11) : 2246 - 2254
  • [26] Recording an isoelectric interval as an endpoint of left bundle branch pacing with continuous paced intracardiac
    Wu, Hao
    Jiang, Longfu
    Shen, Jiabo
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 80 (06) : 664 - 671
  • [27] Autothreshold algorithm feasibility and safety in left bundle branch pacing
    Sola-Garcia, Elena
    Molina-Lerma, Manuel
    Jimenez-Jaimez, Juan
    Macias-Ruiz, Rosa
    Sanchez-Millan, Pablo J.
    Tercedor, Luis
    Alvarez, Miguel
    EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):
  • [28] Left bundle branch pacing: An evolving site for physiological pacing
    Mulia, Eka P. B.
    Amadis, Muhammad R.
    Julario, Rerdin
    Dharmadjati, Budi B.
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2021, 37 (06) : 1578 - 1584
  • [29] Intracardiac ultrasound-guided left bundle branch pacing in a bradycardia patient
    Zhang, Jiefang
    Sun, Yaxun
    Zhang, Zuwen
    Jiang, Chenyang
    Fu, Guosheng
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8 (06): : 1030 - 1033
  • [30] Left bundle branch pacing in alternating bundle branch block
    Benezet-Mazuecos, Juan
    Baranchuck, Adrian
    Lozano, Alvaro
    Crosa, Julian
    Miracle, Angel
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 : 250 - 252