Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology

被引:27
作者
Chen, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zou, Fengwei [3 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Xinwei [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [5 ]
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sir Run Run Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Medtronic Plc, CRHF Div, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electrocardiogram; intracardiac electrogram; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal only pacing; mapping;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP. Methods and Results LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, Delta LV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, Delta LV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%. Conclusions Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 457
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy [J].
Chen, Keping ;
Li, Yuqiu ;
Dai, Yan ;
Sun, Qi ;
Luo, Bin ;
Li, Chao ;
Zhang, Shu .
EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (04) :673-680
[2]   Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization [J].
Curila, Karol ;
Jurak, Pavel ;
Jastrzebski, Marek ;
Prinzen, Frits ;
Waldauf, Petr ;
Halamek, Josef ;
Vernooy, Kevin ;
Smisek, Radovan ;
Karch, Jakub ;
Plesinger, Filip ;
Moskal, Pawel ;
Susankova, Marketa ;
Znojilova, Lucie ;
Heckman, Luuk ;
Viscor, Ivo ;
Vondra, Vlastimil ;
Leinveber, Pavel ;
Osmancik, Pavel .
HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (08) :1281-1289
[3]   TOTAL EXCITATION OF ISOLATED HUMAN HEART [J].
DURRER, D ;
VANDAM, RT ;
FREUD, GE ;
JANSE, MJ ;
MEIJLER, FL ;
ARZBAECHER, RC .
CIRCULATION, 1970, 41 (06) :899-+
[4]   Evaluation of R-wave offset in the left chest leads for estimating the left ventricular activation delay: An evaluation based on coronary sinus electrograms and the 12-lead electrocardiogram [J].
Hara, Hideyuki ;
Niwano, Shinichi ;
Ito, Hiroshi ;
Karakawa, Masahiro ;
Ako, Junya .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2016, 49 (02) :148-153
[5]   Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum [J].
Hou, Xiaofeng ;
Qian, Zhiyong ;
Wang, Yao ;
Qiu, Yuanhao ;
Chen, Xing ;
Jiang, Hai ;
Jiang, Zeyu ;
Wu, Hongping ;
Zhao, Zhongqiang ;
Zhou, Weihua ;
Zou, Jiangang .
EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (11) :1694-1702
[6]   A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing [J].
Huang, Weijian ;
Chen, Xueying ;
Su, Lan ;
Wu, Shengjie ;
Xia, Xue ;
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi .
HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) :1791-1796
[7]   Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture [J].
Jastrzebski, Marek ;
Kiebasa, Grzegorz ;
Curila, Karol ;
Moskal, Pawe ;
Bednarek, Agnieszka ;
Rajzer, Marek ;
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi .
HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (06) :935-943
[8]   Fascicular Ventricular Arrhythmias Pathophysiologic Mechanisms, Anatomical Constructs, and Advances in Approaches to Management [J].
Kapa, Suraj ;
Gaba, Prakriti ;
DeSimone, Christopher V. ;
Asirvatham, Samuel J. .
CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 10 (01)
[9]   Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics [J].
Li, Yuqiu ;
Chen, Keping ;
Dai, Yan ;
Li, Chao ;
Sun, Qi ;
Chen, Ruohan ;
Gold, Michael R. ;
Zhang, Shu .
HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) :1758-1765
[10]   A pilot study to determine if left ventricular activation time is a useful parameter for left bundle branch capture: Validated by ventricular mechanical synchrony with SPECT imaging [J].
Qian, Zhiyong ;
Wang, Yao ;
Hou, Xiaofeng ;
Qiu, Yuanhao ;
Jiang, Zeyu ;
Wu, Hongping ;
Zhao, Zhongqiang ;
Zhou, Weihua ;
Zou, Jiangang .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) :1153-1161