Differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: An algorithm based on intracardiac electrophysiology

被引:27
|
作者
Chen, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zou, Fengwei [3 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Xinwei [1 ]
Qiu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Hou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [5 ]
Zou, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sir Run Run Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Medtronic Plc, CRHF Div, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electrocardiogram; intracardiac electrogram; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal only pacing; mapping;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15350
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a new near-physiological pacing modality. Distinguishing left ventricular septal only pacing (LVSP) from nonselective LBBP still needs clarification. This prospective study sought to establish a differentiation algorithm to confirm LBBP. Methods and Results LBBP was attempted in consecutive patients. If direct LBB capture (LBBP) could not be confirmed, LVSP was considered to have been achieved. Intracardiac left ventricular (LV) activation sequence and activation time were analyzed using coronary sinus (CS) electrogram mapping. Electrophysiological parameters including S-CSmax, S-CSmin, LV lateral wall activation time, Delta LV, and LBB potential were compared between LBBP and LVSP. Stimulated LV activation time (S-LVAT) and stimulated QRS duration (S-QRSd) were also compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction algorithm for LBBP. Of the 43 prospectively enrolled patients, 27 underwent LBBP and 16 underwent LVSP. All LBBP patients showed identical LV activation sequences to their intrinsic rhythm while no LVSP patients maintained their intrinsic sequence. S-CSmax, Delta LV, LV lateral wall activation time, and S-LVAT during LBBP were significantly shorter than those during LVSP. Combining LBB potential with S-LVAT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 for confirming LBBP with a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 93.7%. Conclusions Compared with LVSP, LBBP preserves a normal LV activation sequence and better electrical synchrony. A combination of LBB potential with S-LVAT can be an effective and practical model to distinguish LBBP from LVSP during implantation in patients with normal LBB activation.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 457
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: A systematic review
    Zhu, Kailun
    Li, Linlin
    Liu, Jianghai
    Chang, Dong
    Li, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [2] Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?
    Peng, Xin-Yi
    Wang, Yan-Jiang
    Sun, Lan-Lan
    Shi, Liang
    Cheng, Chao-Di
    Huang, Li-Hong
    Tian, Ying
    Liu, Xing-Peng
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (03) : 539 - 549
  • [3] Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?
    Xin-Yi Peng
    Yan-Jiang Wang
    Lan-Lan Sun
    Liang Shi
    Chao-Di Cheng
    Li-Hong Huang
    Ying Tian
    Xing-Peng Liu
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 539 - 549
  • [4] Novel left ventricular cardiac synchronization: left ventricular septal pacing or left bundle branch pacing?
    Wu, Shengjie
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Huang, Weijian
    EUROPACE, 2020, 22 : 10 - 18
  • [5] Left ventricular septal pacing versus left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of atrioventricular block
    Zhou, Yu
    Wang, Jinfeng
    Wei, Youquan
    Zhang, Wenbo
    Yang, Yuwen
    Rui, Shibao
    Ju, Changlin
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03)
  • [6] Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: a systematic review (vol 9, 1006966, 2022)
    Zhu, Kailun
    Li, Linlin
    Liu, Jianghai
    Chang, Dong
    Li, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [7] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for LBBB Will Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Do?
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (10) : 2247 - 2249
  • [8] Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing
    Wu, Shengjie
    Chen, Xueying
    Wang, Songjie
    Xu, Lei
    Xiao, Fangyi
    Huang, Zhouqing
    Zheng, Rujie
    Jiang, Limeng
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Su, Lan
    Huang, Weijian
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (09) : 1166 - 1177
  • [9] Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chen, Jingjing
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Liu, Xiaoke
    Vaidya, Vaibhav
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Valverde, Arturo M.
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    Madhavan, Malini
    Killu, Ammar M.
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (03): : 150 - 157
  • [10] Which Is More Likely to Achieve Cardiac Synchronization: Left Bundle Branch Pacing or Left Ventricular Septal Pacing?
    Zhu, Kailun
    Chang, Dong
    Li, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9