Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Coronary Artery Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

被引:59
|
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Poddar, Kanhaiya L. [3 ]
Ramasamy, Sureshkumar [3 ]
Rha, Seung-Woon [3 ]
Faxon, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2011年 / 107卷 / 09期
关键词
INTERVENTION; VESSEL; ANGIOPLASTY; SINGLE; REPERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEW) recommend culprit artery-only revascularization (CULPRIT) based on safety concerns during noninfarct-related artery intervention. However, the data to support this safety concern are scant. Searches were performed in PubMed/EMBASE/CENTRAL for studies evaluating multivessel revascularization versus CULPRIT in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD). A multivessel revascularization strategy had to be performed at the time of CULPRIT or during the same hospitalization. Early (<= 30-day) and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Among 19 studies (23 arms) that evaluated 61,764 subjects with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization was performed in a minority of patients (16%). For early outcomes, there was no significant difference for outcomes of mortality, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization, with a 44% decrease in risk of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.81) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. Similarly, for long-term outcomes (follow-up 2.0 +/- 1.1 years), there was no difference for outcomes of MI, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis, with 33%, 43%, and 53% decreases in risk of mortality, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively, and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.72) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization appears to be safe compared to culprit artery-only revascularization. These findings support the need for a large-scale randomized trial to evaluate revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI and MVD. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1300-1310)
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1310
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meta-Analysis Comparing Culprit-Only Versus Complete Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ullah, Waqas
    Zahid, Salman
    Nadeem, Nayab
    Gowda, Smitha
    Munir, Samavia
    Saleem, Sameer
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Alam, Mahboob
    Fischman, David L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 139 : 34 - 39
  • [42] Comparative Effectiveness of Complete Revascularization Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Lingyue
    Guo, Wenqin
    Huang, Weichao
    Wang, Lili
    Mo, Fanrui
    Chen, Xiehui
    Li, Chaoyang
    Huang, Siquan
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [43] Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Banning, Amerjeet S.
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (09)
  • [44] Non-infarct related artery revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Verma, Subodh
    Bagai, Akshay
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 32 (05) : 600 - 607
  • [45] Culprit-Only Versus Complete Coronary Revascularization After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction- A Systematic Review and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
    Lamelas, Pablo
    Winter, Jose
    Villablanca, Pedro A.
    Mehta, Shamir
    Ramakrishna, Harish
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (03) : 850 - 857
  • [46] Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction With or Without ST-Segment Elevation
    Cocco, Marta
    Campo, Gianluca
    Guiducci, Vincenzo
    Casella, Gianni
    Cavazza, Caterina
    Cerrato, Enrico
    Sacchetta, Giorgio
    Moreno, Raul
    Menozzi, Alberto
    Santos, Ignacio Amat
    Gil, Jose Luis Diez
    Scarsini, Roberto
    Picchi, Andrea
    Vadala, Giuseppe
    Pilato, Gerlando
    Colaiori, Iginio
    Barbierato, Marco
    Arioti, Manfredi
    Pavasini, Rita
    Lanzilotti, Valerio
    Menozzi, Mila
    Varbella, Ferdinando
    Erriquez, Andrea
    Biscaglia, Simone
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (20) : 2014 - 2022
  • [47] Optimal Strategy for Complete Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Ueyama, Hiroki A.
    Akita, Keitaro
    Kiyohara, Yuko
    Takagi, Hisato
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Wiley, Jose
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Mehran, Roxana
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 85 (01) : 19 - 38
  • [48] Nomogram to Predict Outcomes After Staged Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Wang, Huaigen
    Ma, Aiqun
    Wang, Tingzhong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2024, 17 : 1713 - 1722
  • [49] Complete Versus Culprit Only Revascularization in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis
    Sethi, Ankur
    Bahekar, Amol
    Bhuriya, Rohit
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Ahmed, Aziz
    Khosla, Sandeep
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [50] Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis
    Campo, Gianluca
    Bohm, Felix
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Smits, Pieter C.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    McCann, Gerry P.
    Wood, David A.
    Serenelli, Matteo
    James, Stefan
    Hofsten, Dan Eik
    Boxm-de Klerk, Bianca M.
    Banning, Adrian
    Cairns, John A.
    Pavasini, Rita
    Stankovic, Goran
    Kala, Petr
    Kelbaek, Henning
    Barbato, Emanuele
    Srdanovic, Ilija
    Hamza, Mohamed
    Banning, Amerjeet S.
    Biscaglia, Simone
    Mehta, Shamir
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150 (19) : 1508 - 1516