Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Coronary Artery Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

被引:60
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Poddar, Kanhaiya L. [3 ]
Ramasamy, Sureshkumar [3 ]
Rha, Seung-Woon [3 ]
Faxon, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
INTERVENTION; VESSEL; ANGIOPLASTY; SINGLE; REPERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEW) recommend culprit artery-only revascularization (CULPRIT) based on safety concerns during noninfarct-related artery intervention. However, the data to support this safety concern are scant. Searches were performed in PubMed/EMBASE/CENTRAL for studies evaluating multivessel revascularization versus CULPRIT in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD). A multivessel revascularization strategy had to be performed at the time of CULPRIT or during the same hospitalization. Early (<= 30-day) and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Among 19 studies (23 arms) that evaluated 61,764 subjects with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization was performed in a minority of patients (16%). For early outcomes, there was no significant difference for outcomes of mortality, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization, with a 44% decrease in risk of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.81) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. Similarly, for long-term outcomes (follow-up 2.0 +/- 1.1 years), there was no difference for outcomes of MI, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis, with 33%, 43%, and 53% decreases in risk of mortality, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively, and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.72) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization appears to be safe compared to culprit artery-only revascularization. These findings support the need for a large-scale randomized trial to evaluate revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI and MVD. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1300-1310)
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1310
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[2]  
[Anonymous], J AM COLL CARDIOL S
[3]   Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Non-Infarct Artery Intervention During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry) [J].
Cavender, Matthew A. ;
Milford-Beland, Sarah ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Weintraub, William S. ;
Rao, Sunil V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (04) :507-513
[4]   Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction [J].
Corpus, RA ;
House, JA ;
Marso, SP ;
Grantham, A ;
Huber, KC ;
Laster, SB ;
Johnson, WL ;
Daniels, WC ;
Barth, CW ;
Giorgi, LV ;
Rutherford, BD .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 148 (03) :493-500
[5]  
Di Mario Carlo, 2004, Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, V6, P128
[6]   Impaired coronary blood flow in nonculprit arteries in the setting of acute myocardial infarction [J].
Gibson, CM ;
Ryan, KA ;
Murphy, SA ;
Mesley, R ;
Marble, SJ ;
Giugliano, RP ;
Cannon, CP ;
Antman, EM ;
Braunwald, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (04) :974-982
[7]   Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. [J].
Goldstein, JA ;
Demetriou, D ;
Grines, CL ;
Pica, M ;
Shoukfeh, M ;
O'Neill, WW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (13) :915-922
[8]  
Grantham J, 2008, CIRCULATION S, V114, pP98
[9]   Culprit Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease [J].
Hannan, Edward L. ;
Samadashvili, Zaza ;
Walford, Gary ;
Holmes, David R., Jr. ;
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
Stamato, Nicholas J. ;
Venditti, Ferdinand J. ;
Sharma, Samin ;
King, Spencer B., III .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (01) :22-31
[10]  
Higgins J, 2009, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470712184