Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Coronary Artery Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

被引:59
|
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Poddar, Kanhaiya L. [3 ]
Ramasamy, Sureshkumar [3 ]
Rha, Seung-Woon [3 ]
Faxon, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2011年 / 107卷 / 09期
关键词
INTERVENTION; VESSEL; ANGIOPLASTY; SINGLE; REPERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEW) recommend culprit artery-only revascularization (CULPRIT) based on safety concerns during noninfarct-related artery intervention. However, the data to support this safety concern are scant. Searches were performed in PubMed/EMBASE/CENTRAL for studies evaluating multivessel revascularization versus CULPRIT in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD). A multivessel revascularization strategy had to be performed at the time of CULPRIT or during the same hospitalization. Early (<= 30-day) and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Among 19 studies (23 arms) that evaluated 61,764 subjects with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization was performed in a minority of patients (16%). For early outcomes, there was no significant difference for outcomes of mortality, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization, with a 44% decrease in risk of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.81) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. Similarly, for long-term outcomes (follow-up 2.0 +/- 1.1 years), there was no difference for outcomes of MI, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis, with 33%, 43%, and 53% decreases in risk of mortality, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively, and major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.72) with multivessel revascularization compared to CULPRIT. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI and MVD, multivessel revascularization appears to be safe compared to culprit artery-only revascularization. These findings support the need for a large-scale randomized trial to evaluate revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI and MVD. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1300-1310)
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1310
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-Analysis of Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Levett, Jeremy Y.
    Windle, Sarah B.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Cabaussel, Josselin
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 40 - 49
  • [2] Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Xu, Haiyan
    Zhang, Xiwen
    Li, Jiangjin
    Liu, Hailang
    Hu, Xiao
    Yang, Jing
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [3] Comprehensive Review of Complete Versus Culprit-only Revascularization for Multivessel Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Jacob, Robin
    Sachedina, Ayaaz K.
    Kumar, Sachin
    HEART INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 15 (01): : 54 - 59
  • [4] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    El-Hayek, Georges E.
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    Hong, Mun K.
    Dominguez, Abel Casso
    Banning, Amerjeet
    Afshar, Arash Ehteshami
    Herzog, Eyal
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (11): : 1481 - 1486
  • [5] Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Toklu, Bora
    Stone, Gregg W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (05): : 529 - 536
  • [6] Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease
    Di Pasquale, Giuseppe
    Filippini, Elisa
    Pavesi, Pier Camillo
    Tortorici, Gianfranco
    Casella, Gianni
    Sangiorgio, Pietro
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (04) : 499 - 506
  • [7] What is optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Multivessel or culprit-only revascularization
    Kim, Min Chul
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Kim, Jong Hyun
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Kim, Young Jo
    Hur, Seung Ho
    Seong, In Whan
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Choi, Dong Hoon
    Cho, Myeong Chan
    Kim, Chong Jin
    Seung, Ki Bae
    Chung, Wook Sung
    Jang, Yang Soo
    Cho, Seung Yun
    Rha, Seung Woon
    Bae, Jang Ho
    Cho, Jeong Gwan
    Park, Seung Jung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 153 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [8] Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Atti, Varunsiri
    Gwon, Yeongjin
    Narayanan, Mahesh Anantha
    Garcia, Santiago
    Sandoval, Yader
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Basir, Mir B.
    Turagam, Mohit K.
    Khandelwal, Akshay
    Mena-Hurtado, Carlos
    Mamas, A. Mamas
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (13) : 1571 - 1582
  • [9] Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease
    Jarakovic, Milana
    Petrovic, Milovan
    Ivanisevic, Dragan
    Mihajlovic, Bojan
    Kovacevic, Mila
    Popov, Iva
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2023, 151 (3-4) : 172 - 178
  • [10] Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Wang, Chong-Hui
    Zhang, Shu-Yang
    Jin, Xiao-Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 228 : 844 - 852