Wildcats in banking fields: the politics of financial inclusion

被引:12
|
作者
Polillo, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Sociol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Financial innovation; Conflict; Prestige; Networks; Field-analysis; MARKET; SOCIOLOGY; CRISIS; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s11186-011-9146-4
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Rightwing theorists argue that we owe the current financial crisis to the democratization of credit, or financial inclusion: politics interfered with the market to benefit marginalized actors, only to cause instability and risk. Leftwing theorists focus instead on financialization: namely, the shift of profit-making activities from industry to finance. These views implicitly draw on Schumpeter and Marx. Much like their intellectual progenitors, they emphasize exogenous processes to explain financial change. Here I claim that the connection between financial innovation and financial inclusion is endogenous. I suggest two main typologies of financial innovators: Market Utopians (MUs) and Populist Innovators (PIs). Financial inclusion, I submit, is the byproduct of the quest for power of the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 383
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条