Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation

被引:28
作者
Alberdi, E
Povyakalo, AA
Strigini, L
Ayton, P
Hartswood, M
Procter, R
Slack, R
机构
[1] City Univ London, Ctr Software Reliabil, London EC1V 0HB, England
[2] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Commun & Collaborat Syst, Sch Informat, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/37646417
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We summarise a set of analyses and studies conducted to assess the effects of the use of a computer-aided detection (CAD) tool in breast screening. We have used an interdisciplinary approach that combines: (a) statistical analyses inspired by reliability modelling in engineering; (b) experimental studies of decisions of mammography experts using the tool, interpreted in the light of human factors psychology; and (c) ethnographic observations of the use of the tool both in trial conditions and in everyday screening practice. Our investigations have shown patterns of human behaviour and effects of computer-based advice that would not have been revealed by a standard clinical trial approach. For example, we found that the negligible measured effect of CAD could be explained by a range of effects on experts' decisions, beneficial in some cases and detrimental in others. There is some evidence of the latter effects being due to the experts using the computer tool differently from the intentions of the developers. We integrate insights from the different pieces of evidence and highlight their implications for the design, evaluation and deployment of this sort of computer tool.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S40
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, P59
[2]   Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography [J].
Alberdi, E ;
Povyakalo, A ;
Strigini, L ;
Ayton, P .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :909-918
[3]   Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: A comparative study [J].
Brem, RF ;
Schoonjans, JM .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (02) :150-154
[4]  
Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
[5]  
Castellino RA, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V217, P400
[6]   Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Risso, G ;
Catarzi, S ;
Bonardi, R ;
Viterbo, V ;
Gnutti, P ;
Guglielmoni, B ;
Pinelli, L ;
Pandiscia, A ;
Navarra, F ;
Lauria, A ;
Palmiero, R ;
Indovina, PL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (02) :135-138
[7]   Context bias - A problem in diagnostic radiology [J].
Egglin, TKP ;
Feinstein, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (21) :1752-1755
[8]  
Hartswood M, 2000, Top Health Inf Manage, V20, P38
[9]  
Hartswood M., 2002, J COGNITION TECHNOLO, V4, P91
[10]  
HARTSWOOD M, 2003, P 8 EUR C COMP SUPP