Optimum placement of actuators in structural and control design using Stackelberg games

被引:12
作者
Ali, Arjumand [1 ]
Ghotbi, Ehsan [1 ]
Dhingra, Anoop K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Mech Engn, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
Actuator placement; multiobjective optimization; game theory; stackelberg games; active control; ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1177/1077546313494113
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Actuator placement has a significant impact on the dynamic response of actively controlled structures. Misplaced actuators and sensors often lead to controllability and observability problems, and the desired system performance may not be achieved with any choice of control law. This paper addresses the design of actively controlled structures wherein both the actuator placement and controller design aspects are addressed simultaneously. It is assumed that a hierarchical structure exists between the actuator placement and controller design objective functions with the actuator placement problem considered as being more important. The resulting multiobjective design problem is solved as a bi-level Stackelberg game. A computational procedure based on variable updating using response surface methods is developed for exchanging information between the two levels (leader and follower). The optimization problem has mixed discrete-continuous variables with discrete variables corresponding to actuator placement and continuous variables associated with the controller design problem. The solution approach includes a blend of genetic algorithms and sequential quadratic programming techniques and is applied to the design of a flexible truss structure. The proposed approach successfully designed an optimum controller while minimizing the weight of the structure and simultaneously maximizing the energy dissipated by the controller to bring the structure to its equilibrium position when subjected to an external disturbance.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1382
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Optimal location of actuators and sensors in active vibration control [J].
Bruant, I ;
Proslier, L .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2005, 16 (03) :197-206
[2]  
Demetriou MA, 2000, P AMER CONTR CONF, P2290, DOI 10.1109/ACC.2000.878588
[3]   Actuator and sensor placement for structural testing and control [J].
Gawronski, W .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1997, 208 (01) :101-109
[4]   A bilevel game theoretic approach to optimum design of flywheels [J].
Ghotbi, Ehsan ;
Dhingra, Anoop K. .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 44 (11) :1337-1350
[5]  
Grandhi R. V., 1992, ENG OPTIMIZ, V19, P51, DOI 10.1080/03052159208941220
[6]   Quasistatic optimal actuator placement with minimum worst case distortion criterion [J].
Hakim, S ;
Fuchs, MB .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (07) :1505-1511
[7]  
Jin IM, 1993, 4493 NASA
[8]   Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design [J].
Lewis, K ;
Mistree, F .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1998, 120 (04) :643-652
[9]   Combinatorial optimal design of number and positions of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms [J].
Li, QS ;
Liu, DK ;
Tang, J ;
Zhang, N ;
Tam, CM .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2004, 270 (4-5) :611-624
[10]  
Liu W, 2004, 17 ASCE ENG MECH C N, P1