Smoking prevalence among US national samples of pregnant women

被引:10
作者
Nighbor, Tyler D. [1 ,2 ]
Coleman, Sulamunn R. M. [1 ,2 ]
Bunn, Janice Y. [4 ]
Kurti, Allison N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zvorsky, Ivori [1 ,3 ]
Orr, Eva J. [1 ]
Higgins, Stephen T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vermont Ctr Behav & Hlth, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Med Biostat, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
Pregnancy; Cigarette smoking; National sample; National survey on drug use and health; Population assessment of tobacco and health; Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system; TOBACCO;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105994
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Several data sources exist for estimating U.S. smoking prevalence among pregnant women, yet each differs in ways that have the potential to impact the estimates. In the present study we used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH), the National Survey on Drug use and Health (NSDUH), and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), three common data sources, to evaluate the following questions about estimating U.S. smoking prevalence among pregnant women: To what extent are estimates impacted by differences in whether the samples include younger (< 18 years) or older (> 44 years) women, represent smoking in any trimester or only the 3rd, and use data from nationally representative or more selected national samples. Among the factors examined, inclusion of younger or older women does not appear to meaningfully alter prevalence estimates. Focusing on only the third trimester likely underestimates smoking prevalence, while the influence of basing estimates on selected national subgroups of women (i.e., only women who delivered live born infants) rather than nationally representative surveys has little discernible influence. Going forward, this research area would benefit from greater consistency in explicitly discussing the sampling methods used and how these various methods may have influenced the estimates reported.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Month-Wise Estimates of Tobacco Smoking During Pregnancy for the United States, 2002-2009
    Alshaarawy, Omayma
    Anthony, James C.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (05) : 1010 - 1015
  • [2] [Anonymous], PREGN RISK ASS MON S
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, NAT SURV DRUG US HLT
  • [4] Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2019, RESULTS 2018 NATL SU
  • [5] The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes
    Cnattingius, S
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2004, 6 : S125 - S140
  • [6] Infant Morbidity and Mortality Attributable to Prenatal Smoking in the US
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    England, Lucinda J.
    Shapiro-Mendoza, Carrie K.
    Tong, Van T.
    Farr, Sherry L.
    Callaghan, William M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [7] Do Elizabeth K, 2018, Prev Med Rep, V12, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.020
  • [8] Use of higher-nicotine/tar-yield (regular full-flavor) cigarettes is associated with nicotine dependence and smoking during pregnancy among US women
    Higgins, Stephen T.
    Redner, Ryan
    Arger, Christopher A.
    Kurti, Allison N.
    Priest, Jeff S.
    Bunn, Janice Y.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 104 : 57 - 62
  • [9] The need for more nuance in headline adult cigarette smoking prevalence estimates
    Hitchman, Sara C.
    Pearson, Jennifer L.
    Villanti, Andrea C.
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (08) : 1327 - 1328
  • [10] Reliability of Reported Maternal Smoking: Comparing the Birth Certificate to Maternal Worksheets and Prenatal and Hospital Medical Records, New York City and Vermont, 2009
    Howland, Renata E.
    Mulready-Ward, Candace
    Madsen, Ann M.
    Sackoff, Judith
    Nyland-Funke, Michael
    Bombard, Jennifer M.
    Tong, Van T.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (09) : 1916 - 1924