Human Health and Ecosystem Impacts of Deep Decarbonization of the Energy System

被引:18
作者
Astudillo, Miguel Fernandez [1 ]
Vaillancourt, Kathleen [2 ]
Pineau, Pierre-Olivier [3 ]
Amor, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Civil & Bldg Engn Dept, Interdisciplinary Res Lab Sustainable Engn & Ecod, 2500 Boul Univ, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Esmia Consultants, Montreal, PQ H3T2A7, Canada
[3] HEC Montreal, Chair Energy Sect Management, 3000 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SCENARIOS; INVENTORIES; EMISSIONS; METHODOLOGY; CHALLENGES; BIOENERGY; TRANSPORT; PATHWAYS; LINKING;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.9b04923
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global warming mitigation strategies are likely to affect human health and biodiversity through diverse cause-effect mechanisms. To analyze these effects, we implement a methodology to link TIMES energy models with life cycle assessment using open-source software. The proposed method uses a cutoff to identify the most relevant processes. These processes have their efficiencies, fuel mixes, and emission factors updated to be consistent with the TIMES model. The use of a cutoff criterion reduces exponentially the number of connection points between models, facilitating the analysis of scenarios with a large number of technologies involved. The method is used to assess the potential effects of deploying low-carbon technologies to reduce combustion emissions in the province of Quebec (Canada). In the case of Quebec, the reduction of combustion emissions is largely achieved through electrification of energy services. Global warming mitigation efforts reduce the impact on human health and ecosystem quality, mainly because of lower global warming, water scarcity, and metal contamination impacts. The TIMES model alone underestimated the reduction of CO2eq by 21% with respect to a full account of emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:14054 / 14062
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [41] Holistic energy system modeling combining multi-objective optimization and life cycle assessment
    Rauner, Sebastian
    Budzinski, Maik
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [42] Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research
    Sandve, Geir Kjetil
    Nekrutenko, Anton
    Taylor, James
    Hovig, Eivind
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 9 (10)
  • [43] Road transport: new life cycle inventories for fossil-fuelled passenger cars and non-exhaust emissions in ecoinvent v3
    Simons, Andrew
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) : 1299 - 1313
  • [44] The net carbon footprint of a newly created boreal hydroelectric reservoir
    Teodoru, Cristian R.
    Bastien, Julie
    Bonneville, Marie-Claude
    del Giorgio, Paul A.
    Demarty, Maud
    Garneau, Michelle
    Helie, Jean-Francois
    Pelletier, Luc
    Prairie, Yves T.
    Roulet, Nigel T.
    Strachan, Ian B.
    Tremblay, Alain
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2012, 26
  • [45] Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition?
    Trutnevyte, Evelina
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 106 : 182 - 193
  • [46] UNEP/SETAC, 2016, Global Guidance for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators, V1
  • [47] The role of bioenergy in low-carbon energy transition scenarios: A case study for Quebec (Canada)
    Vaillancourt, Kathleen
    Bahn, Olivier
    Levasseur, Annie
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 102 : 24 - 34
  • [48] Exploring deep decarbonization pathways to 2050 for Canada using an optimization energy model framework
    Vaillancourt, Kathleen
    Bahn, Olivier
    Frenette, Erik
    Sigvaldason, Oskar
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 : 774 - 785
  • [49] Integrating life cycle assessment and energy system modelling: Methodology and application to the world energy scenarios
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Mutel, Christopher L.
    Panos, Evangelos
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 16 : 121 - 133
  • [50] Energy-economy analysis: Linking the macroeconomic and systems engineering approaches
    Wene, CO
    [J]. ENERGY, 1996, 21 (09) : 809 - 824