Myofunctional Trainer versus Twin Block in Developing Class II Division I Malocclusion: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial

被引:9
作者
Elhamouly, Yasmine [1 ]
El-Housseiny, Azza A. [1 ]
Ismail, Hanan A. [2 ]
El Habashy, Laila M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Pediat Dent & Oral Publ Hlth Dept, Fac Dent, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ, Orthodont Dept, Fac Dent, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
关键词
myofunctional appliances; T4K; functional appliances; twin block; developing class II; FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES;
D O I
10.3390/dj8020044
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the dentoalveolar effects of the myofunctional trainer T4K(TM) versus twin block in children with class II division I malocclusion. Two parallel arm randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted, including twenty healthy children, 9-12 years old, showing Angle's class II division I malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion. Children were randomly assigned into two groups according to the appliance used; Group 1: T4k, and Group II: twin block. Follow-up was done every 4 weeks for 9 months. Postoperative cephalometric X ray, study casts and photographs were taken for measurements and comparison. T4K showed a statistically significant reduction in the overjet (-2.50 +/- 1.00 mm) (p < 0.0001), and a significant increase in the lower arch perimeter (LAP) (1.19 +/- 0.96 mm) (p = 0.01). The twin block showed a statistically significant reduction in the overjet (-3.75 +/- 1.10 mm) (p < 0.0001), a significant reduction in the overbite (-16.22 +/- 17.02 %) (p = 0.03), and a significant increase in the LAP (1.69 +/- 0.70 mm) (p < 0.0001). The overjet showed a higher significant decrease in the twin block group than in T4K (p = 0.03). The mean values of the overbite were significantly decreased in twin block than in T4k (p < 0.0001). Both groups showed significant dentoalveolar improvements toward class I occlusion; however, the twin block showed significantly better results than T4K appliance.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
    Cirgic, Emina
    Kjellberg, Heidrun
    Hansen, Ken
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (05) : 516 - 524
  • [2] Clark W.J., 1995, TWIN BLOCK FUNCTIONA, P13
  • [3] Co.T4K MR, 2003, TRAIN KIDS TM PRE OR
  • [4] Association of malocclusion, happiness, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in schoolchildren
    da Rosa, Guilherme Nascimento
    Del Fabro, Joana Possamai
    Tomazoni, Fernanda
    Tuchtenhagen, Simone
    Alves, Luana Severo
    Ardenghi, Thiago Machado
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2016, 76 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [5] Das U M, 2010, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V28, P30, DOI 10.4103/0970-4388.60480
  • [6] VERTICAL CONTROL OF OVERBITE IN MIXED DENTITION BY TRAINER SYSTEM
    Dirikova, Miroslava
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2014, 20 (05): : 648 - 654
  • [7] Dyer F M, 2001, J Orthod, V28, P271, DOI 10.1093/ortho/28.4.271
  • [8] Ferreira F., 2017, Int. J. Dent. Oral Sci, V4, P503
  • [9] Soft- and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial
    Idris, Ghassan
    Hajeer, Mohammad Y.
    Al-Jundi, Azzam
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 41 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [10] Functional and molecular outcomes of the human masticatory muscles
    Isola, G.
    Anastasi, G. P.
    Matarese, G.
    Williams, R. C.
    Cutroneo, G.
    Bracco, P.
    Piancino, M. G.
    [J]. ORAL DISEASES, 2018, 24 (08) : 1428 - 1441