The personality profile of male Anglican clergy in England: the 16PF

被引：12
作者：
Musson, DJ [1 ]
机构：
[1] Trinity Coll, Ctr Theol & Educ, Carmarthen SA31 3EP, Dyfed, Wales
来源：
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 1998年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词：
16PF; Cattell; clergy; ministry; personality; psychometric;
D O I：
10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00091-9
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
The 16PF Questionnaire was completed by 441 male Anglican clergy of the Church of England who had taken part in Edward King Institute Ministerial Development Workshops over a period of ten years. A number of factors showed significant differences between the personality of the clergy compared to men in general. Clergymen were shown as more outgoing, intelligent, emotionally stable, conscientious, tender-minded, imaginative, apprehensive and tense than the general male population. These findings were discussed in the light of parish ministry and as possible pointers to gender reversal. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：689 / 698
页数：10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1979, The Fate of the Anglican Clergy: A Socilogical Study
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1988, SPSS US GUID
  • [3] Cattell RaymondBernard., 1970, Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF): In clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test
  • [4] CHALMERS EM, 1969, THESIS U TENNESSEE K
  • [5] PERSONALITY OF SELECT THEOLOGICAL STUDENTS
    CHILDERS, RD
    WHITE, WF
    [J]. PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1966, 44 (05): : 507 - 510
  • [6] Eysenck H. J., 1985, Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach, DOI 13877
  • [7] FRANCEK MA, 1991, PHYS GEOGR, V12, P1
  • [8] Francis L. J., 1994, CONTACT, V113, P27
  • [9] Francis L. J., 1992, J EMPIRICAL THEOLOGY, V5, P31, DOI 10.1163/157092592X00235
  • [10] THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONALITY ON CLERGY ROLE PRIORITIZATION, ROLE INFLUENCES, CONFLICT AND DISSATISFACTION WITH MINISTRY
    FRANCIS, LJ
    RODGER, R
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 16 (06) : 947 - 957
123