How Forest Subsidies Impact Household Income: The Case from China

被引:7
作者
Han, Feng [1 ]
Chen, Yaru [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry Policy & Informat, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Forestry & Grassland Adm, Econ Dev Res Ctr, Beijing 100011, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
forestry subsidy; forest farmer; income; impact path; China; REFORM; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/f12081076
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
(1) Background: It is of great significance to evaluate the impact of forestry subsidies on the income of forest farmers to improve policy and enhance efficiency. (2) Methods: Based on the static panel data of household tracking surveys from 2014 to 2018 in Sichuan, Liaoning, and Zhejiang provinces in China, the impacts of forestry subsidies on forest farmer income and impact paths were systematically verified via parameter estimation with the Fixed-Effect model. (3) Results: Forestry subsidies significantly increased forest farmer income. The impact paths could be summarized as follows: First, from the perspective of operating income, forestry subsidies effectively motivated forestry production and promoted the expenditure on forestry production, and thus increased forest farmer operating income. Second, from the perspective of wage income, forestry subsidy policies played a negative role in releasing the forest farmer labor force for off-farm employment. Third, from the perspective of transfer income as a kind of transferred governmental financial subsidy, forestry subsidies covered a large proportion of transfer income for forest farmers. (4) Conclusions: Forestry subsidies could directly increase the transfer income, effectively improve the forestry production capacity, and increase the income of forest farmers. However, forestry subsidies could also bind forest farmers to forestry production to a certain extent, which was not conducive to the liberation of the labor force.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Are forest plantation subsidies affecting land use change and off-farm income? A farm-level analysis of Chilean small forest landowners
    Bopp, Carlos
    Engler, Alejandra
    Jara-Rojas, Roberto
    Arriagada, Rodrigo
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 91
  • [2] [陈妮 Chen Ni], 2018, [中国土地科学, China Land Science], V32, P74
  • [3] Carbon intensity reduction assessment of renewable energy technology innovation in China: A panel data model with cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity
    Cheng, Yuanyuan
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 135 (135)
  • [4] Ding W.E, 2015, AGR EC, V3, P3
  • [5] [董玮 Dong Wei], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P149
  • [6] Economic Development Research Center National Forestry and Grassland Administration of the PRC, 2020, MONITORING EVALUATIO
  • [7] Analysis of the Mechanism Hindering Sustainable Forestry Operations: A Case Study of Japanese Forest Management
    Fuchigami, Yukari
    Hara, Keishiro
    Uwasu, Michinori
    Kurimoto, Shuji
    [J]. FORESTS, 2016, 7 (08)
  • [8] He C, 2017, FOR EC, V39, P31
  • [9] Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity
    Heilmayr, Robert
    Echeverria, Cristian
    Lambin, Eric F.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (09) : 701 - 709
  • [10] Willingness-to-Pay for Eco-Labelled Forest Products in Northern Ireland: An Experimental Auction Approach
    Higgins, Kieran
    Hutchinson, W. George
    Longo, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 87