Tonic and phasic effects of reward on the pupil: implications for locus coeruleus function

被引:9
作者
Cole, Laura [1 ]
Lightman, Stafford [1 ]
Clark, Rosie [2 ]
Gilchrist, Iain D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Henry Wellcome Labs Integrat Neurosci & Endocrinol, Bristol, Gloucestershire, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, 12a Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TU, Gloucestershire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
pupil; locus coeruleus; reward; auditory oddball paradigm; CERULEUS NEURONS; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; ADAPTIVE GAIN; TOP-DOWN; MONKEY; NOREPINEPHRINE; NORADRENALINE; ACTIVATION; MECHANISMS; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2022.1545
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The locus coeruleus (LC), a nucleus in the pons of the brainstem, plays a significant role in attention and cognitive control. Here, we use an adapted auditory oddball paradigm and measured the pupil dilation response, to provide a marker of LC activity in humans. In Experiment 1, we show event-related pupil responses to rare auditory events which were further elevated by task relevant. In Experiment 2, by asking participants to silently count the number of oddballs, we demonstrated that the task-relevance elevation was not a result of the generation or execution of the manual response. In Experiment 3, we observed two separate effects of reward on the pupil response. First, we found an overall increase in pupil area in the high compared to the low-reward blocks: a sustained effect reminiscent of the tonic changes that occur in LC. Second, we found elevated event-related pupil responses to behaviourally relevant stimuli in the high-reward condition compared with the low-reward condition, consistent with phasic changes in LC in response to a stimulus. These results highlight the complexity of the relationship between the pupil response and reward, and the inferred role of LC in both top-down and bottom-up cognitive control.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, JASP VERS 0 8 1
  • [2] An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance
    Aston-Jones, G
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 28 : 403 - 450
  • [3] ASTONJONES G, 1981, J NEUROSCI, V1, P876
  • [4] ASTONJONES G, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P4467
  • [5] Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
    Awh, Edward
    Belopolsky, Artem V.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) : 437 - 443
  • [6] Differential attentional control mechanisms by two distinct noradrenergic coeruleo-frontal cortical pathways
    Bari, Andrea
    Xu, Sangyu
    Pignatelli, Michele
    Takeuchi, Daigo
    Feng, Jiesi
    Li, Yulong
    Tonegawa, Susumu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (46) : 29080 - 29089
  • [7] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [8] TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES
    BEATTY, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) : 276 - 292
  • [9] Liking, Wanting, and the Incentive-Sensitization Theory of Addiction
    Berridge, Kent C.
    Robinson, Terry E.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (08) : 670 - 679
  • [10] The Pupillary Light Response Reflects Encoding, but Not Maintenance, in Visual Working Memory
    Blom, Tessel
    Mathot, Sebastiaan
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (11) : 1716 - 1723