Carbon prices forecasting in quantiles

被引:79
作者
Ren, Xiaohang [1 ]
Duan, Kun [2 ]
Tao, Lizhu [3 ]
Shi, Yukun [4 ]
Yan, Cheng [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Coll Math, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Carbon return predictability; Dimension reduction techniques; Out-of-sample forecasting; Quantile regression; LASSO penalty; SCAD penalty; Variable selection; CRUDE-OIL; TECHNICAL ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC LINKAGES; STOCK-PRICES; CLEAN ENERGY; REGRESSION; VOLATILITY; MARKETS; SPILLOVERS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105862
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes two new methods (the Quantile Group LASSO and the Quantile Group SCAD models) to evaluate the predictability of a large group of factors on carbon futures returns. The most powerful predictors are selected through the dimension-reduction mechanism of the two models, while potential differences of the statistically significant predictors for different quantiles of carbon returns are carefully considered. First, we find that the proposed models outperform a series of competing ones with respect to prediction accuracy. Second, impacts of the selected predictors over the carbon price distribution are estimated through a quantile approach, which outperforms the mean shrinkage model in our case with data featured by a non-normal distribution. Specifically, the Brent spot price, the crude oil closing stock in the UK, and the growth of natural gas production in the UK are found to impact carbon futures returns only in extreme conditions with a strong asymmetric feature. Importantly, our estimators remain robust against the extreme event caused by the Covid19. Our findings reveal that the identification of appropriate carbon return predictors and their impacts hinge on the carbon market conditions, and should be of interest to various stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007 [J].
Alberola, Emilie ;
Chevallier, Julien ;
Cheze, Benoit .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) :787-797
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
[3]  
Bachmeier LJ, 2006, ENERG J, V27, P55
[4]   Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :159-172
[5]   Forecasting the Real Price of Oil in a Changing World: A Forecast Combination Approach [J].
Baumeister, Christiane ;
Kilian, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2015, 33 (03) :338-351
[6]   Modeling the price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances [J].
Benz, Eva ;
Trueck, Stefan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (01) :4-15
[7]   An emerging equilibrium in the EU emissions trading scheme [J].
Bredin, Don ;
Muckley, Cal .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (02) :353-362
[8]   CHANGES IN THE UNITED-STATES WAGE STRUCTURE 1963-1987 - APPLICATION OF QUANTILE REGRESSION [J].
BUCHINSKY, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (02) :405-458
[9]   Forecasting carbon futures volatility using GARCH models with energy volatilities [J].
Byun, Suk Joon ;
Cho, Hangjun .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 :207-221
[10]   Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average? [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Thompson, Samuel B. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (04) :1509-1531