Open Complete Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Initial Experience

被引:14
|
作者
Khoder, Wael Y. [1 ]
Schlenker, Boris [1 ]
Waidelich, Raphaela [1 ]
Buchner, Alexander [1 ]
Kellhammer, Nicole [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
Becker, Armin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Grosshadern Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; FASCIA; CONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To report our refinement of open intrafascial retropubic radical prostatectomy (OIF-RP) and 1-year follow-up results. PATIENTS AND METHODS OIF-RP was performed in 231 cases of clinically localized Prostate cancer in a prospective study from January 2007 to December 2009. Inclusion criteria were good potency (IIEF-5 score >= 15), Gleason score <= 6, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <= 10, and clinical T1-2 tumors. Endopelvic fascia was not incised, and the prostate capsule was freed laterally from surrounding fasciae and dorsally from Denonvillier's fascia, keeping all periprostatic fasciae/nerves intact. Functional outcomes were followed at 3 and 12 months (3 M and 12 M). Continence defined as complete (no pads), grade I (1-2pads/day) and grade II (>2pads/day). RESULTS Median age was 63.3 years, body mass index 25.6, and PSA 5.4 ng/mL. Median operating time was 65 minutes (range 50-250), blood loss was 150 mL (range 50-1000), preoperative IIEF-score was 23 (range 15-25). Pathologic stage was pT2 (91%) and pT3 (9%). Gleason score was <= 6 (73%) and >= 7 (27%). Positive margins were 10% (pT2) and 65% (pT3). There were no postoperative complications/reinterventions. At 3 M, 60% of patients had full continence, and 86% had full continence at 12 M (<60 years, 64% and 95% after 3 M and 12 M, respectively). At 3 M and 12 M, median IIEF-score was 14 (range 0-25) and 19 (range 0-25), respectively. Baseline IIEF-score was reached by 50% (3 M) and 78% (12 M) (P<.001). IIEF-score was inversely correlated to patients' age (<60 years 92%, 60-69 years 77%, >= 70 years 60%). CONCLUSION OIF-RP follows rationales of radical prostatectomy and might be considered for selected patients. Preserving all periprostatic fasciae/nerves recuperates early continence and maintains potency without affecting oncological outcomes. UROLOGY 79: 717-721, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 721
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Description of the technique and patients' outcome
    Kavallaris, A.
    Hornemann, A.
    Chalvatzas, N.
    Luedders, D.
    Diedrich, K.
    Bohlmann, M. K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (02) : 198 - 201
  • [42] Nerve injury-related erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A novel experimental dissection model
    Yamashita, Shinichi
    Kato, Ryuichi
    Kobayashi, Ko
    Hisasue, Shin-ichi
    Arai, Yoichi
    Tsukamoto, Taiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) : 905 - 911
  • [43] The timing of penile rehabilitation after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy affects the recovery of erectile function
    Mulhall, John P.
    Parker, Marilyn
    Waters, Bedford W.
    Flanigan, Robert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [44] Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Ko, Woo Jin
    Hruby, Gregory W.
    Turk, Andrew T.
    Landman, Jaime
    Badani, Ketan K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (03) : 451 - 458
  • [45] Choosing the Best Candidates for Penile Rehabilitation after Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
    Briganti, Alberto
    Di Trapani, Ettore
    Abdollah, Firas
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Salonia, Andrea
    DiGirolamo, Valerio
    Colombo, Renzo
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (02): : 608 - 617
  • [46] A novel tool to assess the risk of urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Abdollah, Firas
    Sun, Maxine
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gallina, Andrea
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Bianchi, Marco
    Salonia, Andrea
    Colombo, Renzo
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 905 - 913
  • [47] Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
    Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
    Fraga, Clovis T. Pereira
    Annino, Filippo
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Calado, Adriano A.
    Mugnier, Camille
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05): : 1503 - 1512
  • [48] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Wesley W. Choi
    Marcos P. Freire
    Jane R. Soukup
    Lei Yin
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Fernando Carvas
    Stephen B. Williams
    Jim C. Hu
    World Journal of Urology, 2011, 29 : 21 - 27
  • [49] Anatomical consideration for the technique of nerve-sparing during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Balaya, V.
    Ngo, C.
    Rossi, L.
    Cornou, C.
    Bensaid, C.
    Douard, R.
    Bats, A. S.
    Lecuru, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2016, 44 (09): : 517 - 525
  • [50] Randomized controlled trial comparing open anterograde anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy with retrograde technique
    Carrerette, Fabricio B.
    Rodeiro, Daniela B.
    Rui, T. F.
    Santos, Paulo A.
    Lara, Celso C.
    Damiao, Ronaldo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (02) : 151 - 157