Open Complete Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Initial Experience

被引:14
|
作者
Khoder, Wael Y. [1 ]
Schlenker, Boris [1 ]
Waidelich, Raphaela [1 ]
Buchner, Alexander [1 ]
Kellhammer, Nicole [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
Becker, Armin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Grosshadern Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; FASCIA; CONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To report our refinement of open intrafascial retropubic radical prostatectomy (OIF-RP) and 1-year follow-up results. PATIENTS AND METHODS OIF-RP was performed in 231 cases of clinically localized Prostate cancer in a prospective study from January 2007 to December 2009. Inclusion criteria were good potency (IIEF-5 score >= 15), Gleason score <= 6, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <= 10, and clinical T1-2 tumors. Endopelvic fascia was not incised, and the prostate capsule was freed laterally from surrounding fasciae and dorsally from Denonvillier's fascia, keeping all periprostatic fasciae/nerves intact. Functional outcomes were followed at 3 and 12 months (3 M and 12 M). Continence defined as complete (no pads), grade I (1-2pads/day) and grade II (>2pads/day). RESULTS Median age was 63.3 years, body mass index 25.6, and PSA 5.4 ng/mL. Median operating time was 65 minutes (range 50-250), blood loss was 150 mL (range 50-1000), preoperative IIEF-score was 23 (range 15-25). Pathologic stage was pT2 (91%) and pT3 (9%). Gleason score was <= 6 (73%) and >= 7 (27%). Positive margins were 10% (pT2) and 65% (pT3). There were no postoperative complications/reinterventions. At 3 M, 60% of patients had full continence, and 86% had full continence at 12 M (<60 years, 64% and 95% after 3 M and 12 M, respectively). At 3 M and 12 M, median IIEF-score was 14 (range 0-25) and 19 (range 0-25), respectively. Baseline IIEF-score was reached by 50% (3 M) and 78% (12 M) (P<.001). IIEF-score was inversely correlated to patients' age (<60 years 92%, 60-69 years 77%, >= 70 years 60%). CONCLUSION OIF-RP follows rationales of radical prostatectomy and might be considered for selected patients. Preserving all periprostatic fasciae/nerves recuperates early continence and maintains potency without affecting oncological outcomes. UROLOGY 79: 717-721, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 721
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Freire, Marcos P.
    Soukup, Jane R.
    Yin, Lei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Carvas, Fernando
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [32] Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes
    Shin, Tae Young
    Lee, Yong Seong
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (03) : 314 - 321
  • [33] Nerve-sparing Techniques During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Clips
    Zhu, Alec
    Basourakos, Spyridon P.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 104 - 105
  • [34] Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Heinrich, Elmar
    Schoen, Georg
    Schiefelbein, Frank
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Trojan, Lutz
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 709 - 713
  • [35] The effects of a nerve-sparing procedure on urinary incontinence and sexual function among radical prostatectomy patients
    Lin, Yu-Hua
    Lin, Victor Chia-Hsiang
    Yu, Tsan-Jung
    Chen, Tai-Been
    Yang, Mei-Sang
    Kao, Chia-Chan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING, 2011, 5 (03) : 131 - 138
  • [36] Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE): results after 20 years of experience
    Ambrosini, Francesca
    Preisser, Felix
    Tilki, Derya
    Heinzer, Hans
    Salomon, Georg
    Michl, Uwe
    Steuber, Thomas
    Maurer, Tobias
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Budaeus, Lars
    Pose, Randi M.
    Terrone, Carlo
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Haese, Alexander
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024,
  • [37] Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies
    Xiao Wang
    Yiqi Wu
    Jia Guo
    Hui Chen
    Xiaodong Weng
    Xiuheng Liu
    BMC Urology, 19
  • [38] Improved patient-reported functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy by using NeuroSAFE technique
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Aas, Kirsti
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Kvan, Espen
    Falk, Ragnhild Sorum
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartvig
    Berge, Viktor
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) : 385 - 391
  • [39] Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies
    Wang, Xiao
    Wu, Yiqi
    Guo, Jia
    Chen, Hui
    Weng, Xiaodong
    Liu, Xiuheng
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [40] Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Moris, Lisa
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Vilaseca, Antoni
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Briers, Erik
    De Santis, Maria
    Gillessen, Silke
    Grivas, Nikos
    O'Hanlon, Shane
    Henry, Ann
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Lardas, Michael
    Mason, Malcolm
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    van der Poel, Henk
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Willemse, Peter-Paul
    Yuan, Cathy Y.
    Grummet, Jeremy P.
    Tilki, Derya
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Cornford, Philip
    Mottet, Nicolas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 690 - 700