Open Complete Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: Technique and Initial Experience

被引:14
|
作者
Khoder, Wael Y. [1 ]
Schlenker, Boris [1 ]
Waidelich, Raphaela [1 ]
Buchner, Alexander [1 ]
Kellhammer, Nicole [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
Becker, Armin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Grosshadern Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; FASCIA; CONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To report our refinement of open intrafascial retropubic radical prostatectomy (OIF-RP) and 1-year follow-up results. PATIENTS AND METHODS OIF-RP was performed in 231 cases of clinically localized Prostate cancer in a prospective study from January 2007 to December 2009. Inclusion criteria were good potency (IIEF-5 score >= 15), Gleason score <= 6, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <= 10, and clinical T1-2 tumors. Endopelvic fascia was not incised, and the prostate capsule was freed laterally from surrounding fasciae and dorsally from Denonvillier's fascia, keeping all periprostatic fasciae/nerves intact. Functional outcomes were followed at 3 and 12 months (3 M and 12 M). Continence defined as complete (no pads), grade I (1-2pads/day) and grade II (>2pads/day). RESULTS Median age was 63.3 years, body mass index 25.6, and PSA 5.4 ng/mL. Median operating time was 65 minutes (range 50-250), blood loss was 150 mL (range 50-1000), preoperative IIEF-score was 23 (range 15-25). Pathologic stage was pT2 (91%) and pT3 (9%). Gleason score was <= 6 (73%) and >= 7 (27%). Positive margins were 10% (pT2) and 65% (pT3). There were no postoperative complications/reinterventions. At 3 M, 60% of patients had full continence, and 86% had full continence at 12 M (<60 years, 64% and 95% after 3 M and 12 M, respectively). At 3 M and 12 M, median IIEF-score was 14 (range 0-25) and 19 (range 0-25), respectively. Baseline IIEF-score was reached by 50% (3 M) and 78% (12 M) (P<.001). IIEF-score was inversely correlated to patients' age (<60 years 92%, 60-69 years 77%, >= 70 years 60%). CONCLUSION OIF-RP follows rationales of radical prostatectomy and might be considered for selected patients. Preserving all periprostatic fasciae/nerves recuperates early continence and maintains potency without affecting oncological outcomes. UROLOGY 79: 717-721, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 721
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients
    Bellina, M
    Mari, M
    Ambu, A
    Guercio, S
    Rolle, L
    Tampellini, M
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2005, 75 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [22] Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: current concepts in a robotic era
    Srivastava, A.
    Tan, G.
    Grover, S.
    Tewari, A. K.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2010, 52 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [23] Evaluatoion of intraoperative histology during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Kotov, S. V.
    Byadretdinov, I. S.
    Guspanov, R. I.
    Pulbere, S. A.
    Yusufov, A. G.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2023, 19 (04): : 52 - 60
  • [24] Anatomic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:: Comparison of retrograde and antegrade techniques
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Moazin, Maher
    Gozen, Ali S.
    Teber, Dogu
    Frede, Thomas
    Su, Li-Ming
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (03) : 587 - 591
  • [25] Association of nerve-sparing grading in robotic radical prostatectomy and trifecta outcome
    Horta Gorgen, Antonio Rebello
    Burttet, Lucas Medeiros
    Cachoeira, Eduardo Tosetto
    Knijnik, Pedro Glusman
    Brum, Pietro Waltrick
    Paludo, Artur de Oliveira
    Cabral, Renan Desimon
    Rosito, Tiago Elias
    Berger, Milton
    Pavlovich, Christian Paul
    Silva Neto, Brasil
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 2925 - 2930
  • [26] Oncological and functional results of open intrafascial radical prostatectomy
    Khoder, W. Y.
    Buchner, A.
    Siegert, S.
    Stief, C. G.
    Schlenker, B.
    UROLOGE, 2011, 50 (09): : 1106 - 1109
  • [27] Unrecognized Pitfall When Doing Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Radical Prostatectomy
    Blas, Leandro
    Shiota, Masaki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (09) : 4775 - 4776
  • [28] Recovery of sexual function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy or cystectomy
    Miyao, N
    Adachi, H
    Sato, Y
    Horita, H
    Takahashi, A
    Masumori, N
    Kitamura, H
    Tsukamoto, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 8 (04) : 158 - 164
  • [29] Rehabilitative therapy for erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Bannowsky, Andreas
    Schulze, Heiko
    Junemann, Klaus-Peter
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2010, 7 (04) : 390 - 395
  • [30] Xi Nerve-sparing Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy: European Single-center Technique and Outcomes
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Minafra, Paolo
    Papapicco, Giuseppe
    De Rienzo, Gaetano
    Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Vitarelli, Antonio
    Ditonno, Pasquale
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 55 - 62