Developing communications about CCS: three lessons learned

被引:7
作者
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine [1 ,2 ]
Mayer, Lauren A. [3 ]
Morgan, M. Granger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Ctr Decis Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; RISK PERCEPTION; ELECTRICITY PORTFOLIOS; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; LOW-LITERACY; COMPREHENSION; EXPLANATION; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; PERSEVERANCE;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2014.983951
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
To curb the risks of climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change posits that global CO2 emissions from the energy supply sector must be reduced to 90% below 2010 levels between 2040 and 2070. Electricity generation is the largest contributor to emissions from the energy supply sector. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) holds the promise of helping to reduce CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants, as part of a low-carbon portfolio that could also include energy efficiency, natural gas, renewables and nuclear power. To inform peoples decisions about whether or not to support the implementation of CCS, our team created brochures about 10 low-carbon technologies as well as a computer tool that helped users to develop technically realistic low-carbon portfolios. Here, we highlight three main lessons we learned in developing these communications about CCS: (1) when learning about CCS people also want to know about other alternatives; (2) using simple wording improves understanding, even about complex technologies; and (3) the time to communicate about CCS is now. © 2015 Taylor and Francis.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 705
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   PERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES - THE ROLE OF EXPLANATION IN THE PERSISTENCE OF DISCREDITED INFORMATION [J].
ANDERSON, CA ;
LEPPER, MR ;
ROSS, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (06) :1037-1049
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EFFECTIVE RISK COMMU
[3]  
[Anonymous], ED PSYCHOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], J RISK RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, RISK COMMUNICATION M
[6]   DETERMINANTS OF JUDGED VALIDITY [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BOEHM, LE ;
XU, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (06) :576-605
[7]   From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication [J].
Ashworth, Peta ;
Boughen, Naomi ;
Mayhew, Melissa ;
Millar, Frances .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (02) :426-433
[8]   The Role of Social Factors in Shaping Public Perceptions of CCS: Results of Multi-State Focus Group Interviews in the US [J].
Bradbury, Judith ;
Ray, Isha ;
Peterson, Tarla ;
Wade, Sarah ;
Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle ;
Feldpausch, Andrea .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :4665-4672
[9]   RECALL OF MEDICAL ADVICE - COMPREHENSIBILITY AND SPECIFICITY [J].
BRADSHAW, PW ;
LEY, P ;
KINCEY, JA ;
BRADSHAW, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 14 (FEB) :55-62
[10]   Risk perception of mobile communication: a mental models approach [J].
Cousin, Marie-Eve ;
Siegrist, Michael .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2010, 13 (05) :599-620