CYBER DATING ABUSE: PREVALENCE, CONTEXT, AND RELATIONSHIP WITH OFFLINE DATING AGGRESSION

被引：151
作者：
Borrajo, E. [1 ]
Gamez-Guadix, M. [2 ]
Calvete, E. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Deusto, Dept Psychol & Educ, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
来源：
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS | 2015年 / 116卷 / 02期
关键词：
INTIMATE PARTNER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; PHYSICAL AGGRESSION; ONLINE HARASSMENT; NATIONAL SAMPLE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; VIOLENCE; GENDER; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I：
10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) as tools to intimidate, harass, and control the partner has been, so far, little studied in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the extension and sex differences of victimization of cyber dating abuse, as well as the context in which it occurs, and its relationship with offline psychological and physical aggressions. The sample consisted of 433 college students ages 18 to 30 years. The results showed that over 50% of the participants had been victims of some type of cyber dating abuse in the last six months. The most common behavior was the use of ICT to control the partner. Also, victims of cyber dating abuse were victimized repeatedly, an average of 23 times in the last six months. The data also showed that cyber dating abuse appear usually in a context of jealousy. Finally, the results revealed a significant relationship between cyber dating abuse and offline psychological dating aggressions. Limitations and future lines of research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码：565 / 585
页数：21
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Almendros C, 2009, BEHAV PSYCHOL, V17, P433
[2]  
Archer J, 2000, PSYCHOL BULL, V126, P697, DOI [10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.697, 10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.697]
[3]   Consequences of teen dating violence - Understanding intervening variables in ecological context [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. ;
Cross, Charlotte .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2008, 14 (09) :998-1013
[4]   Attacking Others Online: The Formation of Cyberbullying in Late Adolescence [J].
Barlett, Christopher P. ;
Gentile, Douglas A. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA CULTURE, 2012, 1 (02) :123-135
[5]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN PHYSICAL, VERBAL, AND INDIRECT AGGRESSION - A REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH [J].
BJORKQVIST, K .
SEX ROLES, 1994, 30 (3-4) :177-188
[6]   Dating violence victimization across the teen years: Abuse frequency, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence [J].
Bonomi, Amy E. ;
Anderson, Melissa L. ;
Nemeth, Julianna ;
Bartle-Haring, Suzanne ;
Buettner, Cynthia ;
Schipper, Deborah .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
[7]  
Buesa S, 2011, AN PSICOL-SPAIN, V27, P774
[8]   Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates [J].
Burke, Sloane C. ;
Wallen, Michele ;
Vail-Smith, Karen ;
Knox, David .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1162-1167
[9]   Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment [J].
Card, Noel A. ;
Stucky, Brian D. ;
Sawalani, Gita M. ;
Little, Todd D. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 79 (05) :1185-1229
[10]   Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? [J].
Christofides, Emily ;
Muise, Amy ;
Desmarais, Serge .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 12 (03) :341-345
123456