Short-term forecast of high-energy electron flux based on GPR

被引:1
作者
Peng, Guangshuai [1 ]
Lu, Jianyong [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxin [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Guanglin [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Zhiqiang [4 ]
Shen, Chao [5 ]
Yi, Meng [6 ]
Hao, Yuhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Inst Space Weather, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Ctr Space Weather, Natl Satellite Meteorol Ctr, Key Lab Space Weather, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Innovat Ctr FengYun Meteorol Satellite FYSIC, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Astronaut, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
[6] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Coll Liberal Arts, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
High-energy electron flux; GPR; Delayed analysis; Storm-time events; RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS; QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION; GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT; WAVES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10509-022-04123-9
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The rapid enhancement of high-energy electron flux affects the safe operation of satellites in the synchronous orbit area, so accurate forecast of flux is a key focus in space weather research. This study uses >2 MeV electron flux, solar wind parameters, and geomagnetic parameters from 2001 to 2006 to perform a delayed analysis of input parameters and establish a prediction model named gaussian process regression (GPR) based on machine learning, where sets of 2001-2005 are used as training and sets from January to December in 2006 as testing. It is shown that the GPR is found to have a better performance when comparing with four typical and widely used models: RDF, Low-E, FLUXPRED, and REFM. It also outperforms other intelligence models like backward propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector machine regression (SVR), decision tree regression (DT), and long short-term memory network (LSTM) in terms of flux forecast. The prediction efficiency (PE), correlation coefficient (R), and root mean square error (RMSE) of our GPR model are 0.83, 0.91, and 0.39, respectively. The validation of GPR is further verified by its relatively better prediction of extreme disturbed events in which electron flux suddenly increased or decreased by several orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   LINEAR PREDICTION FILTER ANALYSIS OF RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON PROPERTIES AT 6.6 RE [J].
BAKER, DN ;
MCPHERRON, RL ;
CAYTON, TE ;
KLEBESADEL, RW .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1990, 95 (A9) :15133-15140
[2]  
Claveria O., 2017, SSRN ELECT J
[3]   Neural network prediction of relativistic electrons at geosynchronous orbit during the storm recovery phase: effects of recurring substorms [J].
Fukata, M ;
Taguchi, S ;
Okuzawa, T ;
Obara, T .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2002, 20 (07) :947-951
[4]   Long short-term memory and gated recurrent neural networks to predict the ionospheric vertical total electron content [J].
Iluore, Kenneth ;
Lu, Jianyong .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2022, 70 (03) :652-665
[5]   Prediction of the electron flux environment in geosynchronous orbit using a neural network technique [J].
Kitamura, K. ;
Nakamura, Y. ;
Tokumitsu, M. ;
Ishida, Y. ;
Watari, S. .
ARTIFICIAL LIFE AND ROBOTICS, 2011, 16 (03) :389-392
[6]   On the predictive potential of Pc5 ULF waves to forecast relativistic electrons based on their relationships over two solar cycles [J].
Lam, Hing-Lan .
SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 15 (01) :163-179
[7]   Quantitative prediction of radiation belt electrons at geostationary orbit based on solar wind measurements [J].
Li, XL ;
Temerin, M ;
Baker, DN ;
Reeves, GD ;
Larson, D .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (09) :1887-1890
[8]   A neural network-based geosynchronous relativistic electron flux forecasting model [J].
Ling, A. G. ;
Ginet, G. P. ;
Hilmer, R. V. ;
Perry, K. L. .
SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 8
[9]   Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Health Indicator and Gaussian Process Regression Model [J].
Liu, Jian ;
Chen, Ziqiang .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :39474-39484
[10]   Nonparametric Local Pseudopotentials with Machine Learning: A Tin Pseudopotential Built Using Gaussian Process Regression [J].
Luder, Johann ;
Manzhos, Sergei .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2020, 124 (52) :11111-11124